City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
25.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Good For All Leadership Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
Delray Beach: | 40 |
Good For All Leadership Academy: | 25 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 278-3533 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 284
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 278-3633
Principal: Valarie Thompson
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 29
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 70% |
State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 73% |
State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 58% |
State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 67% |
State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 78% |
State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 585 |
State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 73% |
State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 79% |
State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 883 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 882 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 260
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 859
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 331
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 48% |
State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 68% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 68% |
State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 541 |
State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 83% |
State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 888 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 887 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 862
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 841
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 861
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 841
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 43% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 39% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 353 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 636 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 635 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 61% |
State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 64% |
State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 94% |
State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 43% |
State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 63% |
State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 61% |
State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 61% |
State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 517 |
State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 71% |
State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 876 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 875 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 279
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 844
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 825
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 847
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 829
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 283
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 334
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 624 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 623 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 596
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 580
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 599
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 584
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 36% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 37% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 1789 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 17% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 25% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 69% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1842 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 68% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1917 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 15% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 18% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 3% |
State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1799 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1857 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 16% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 27% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 10% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 65% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1938 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 16% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 71% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1732 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1829 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1861 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 306 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1757 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1852 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 1882 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 281
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1741 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1742 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1844 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1731 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1825 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1912 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsGOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 312 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 680 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Informational (max 18)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 13 |
State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 274 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 680 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Informational (max 18)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 12 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 285 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 689 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)GOOD SCHOOLS FOR ALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 284
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 317 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Delray Beach, FL
- Good For All Leadership Academy School in Delray Beach, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: