City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (9.2 miles): | 98 |
| South Pointe Elementary School (14.4 miles): | 74 |
| Miami Palmetto Senior High School (5.2 miles): | 60 |
| North Glade Elementary School (15.4 miles): | 45 |
| Miami Lakes Middle School (13.9 miles): | 31 |
| Riviera Middle School: | 27 |
| Miami Senior High School (8.6 miles): | 16 |
| Campbell Drive Middle School (17.7 miles): | 6 |
| Robert Renick Education Center School (18.4 miles): | 0 |
Riviera Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Miami: | 44 |
| Riviera Middle School: | 27 |
1
roberto
Jan 10, 2013 @ 7:19 pm
I think this school will can be great evolution for all studient.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 6801
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 226-1025
Magnet Program.
Principal: Valerie V Carrier
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 114
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://riviera.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 63% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 43% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 62% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 505 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 137 schools: | 53% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 824 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 825 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 753
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 752
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 737 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 737 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 669
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 668
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 676 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 676 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 611
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 610
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 169
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 141 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 136 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 487 |
| State average from 133 schools: | 540 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 134 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 132 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 139 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 749 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 750 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 678
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 674
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 647 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 648 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 582
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 578
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 557 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 558 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 501
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 501
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 122 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 506 |
| State average from 122 schools: | 535 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 124 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 126 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 125 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 667 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 667 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 592
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 593 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 593 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 533
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 457 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 457 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 405
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 401
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 27% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 37% |
Making Reading Gains
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 55% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 63% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 481 |
| State average from 63 schools: | 461 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Minority Rate
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 92% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 639 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 572 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 570 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 444 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 442 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (90%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 49% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 55% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 82% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 57% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 428 |
| State average from 62 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 62 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 63 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 687 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 688 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 586 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 587 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 438 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 44% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 48% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 56% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 59% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 378 |
| State average from 53 schools: | 362 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 97% |
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 53 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 52 schools: | 51% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1660 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 302 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 62% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1747 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1845 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 28% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1667 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1768 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1865 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1622 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1774 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1788 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%| Here: | 276 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1626 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1804 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1824 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 195
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1665 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 303 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1676 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 296 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 289 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1671 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 303 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 314 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 251 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 665 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 58 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 179 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 665 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 52 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 190 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 54 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 190
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%| Here: | 287 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1562 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 284 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1580 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 37| Here: | 1543 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1681 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 293 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1724 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 76| Here: | 1648 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1769 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 285 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1815 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84| Here: | 1731 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%| Here: | 277 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1590 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1595 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -3| Here: | 1598 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1737 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1770 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 193| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1852 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1868 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99| Here: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 179
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 52| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 658 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 193
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 51| Here: | 664 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 215
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 54| Here: | 677 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 179
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 49| Here: | 653 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 191
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 59| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 212
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 68| Here: | 697 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 197
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%| RIVIERA MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 256 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 79%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.