Rodgers Middle School in Riverview, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 54.

11910 TUCKER RD
Riverview, FL 33569

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (14.8 miles):

92
Coleman Middle School (14.6 miles):

73
Rodgers Middle School:

54
Pierce Middle School (17.2 miles):

45
Marshall Middle School (16.7 miles):

37
Giunta Middle School (5.8 miles):

25
Mount Pleasant Standard Base Middle School (13.6 miles):

15
Brandon Alternative School (11.4 miles):

1
Riverside Academy School (14.4 miles):

0
Rodgers Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Riverview:

43
Rodgers Middle School:

54

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 671-5288 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3771
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 671-5245
Principal: Clara Davis
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 56
Senate District: 10

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

558
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 911 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 911 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 299
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 836
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 837
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 797
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 142
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 257 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 526 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 473
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 449

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 447
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

555
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1155 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 365
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1067
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1002

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1066
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1002
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 617 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 617 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 204
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 590
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 571

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 591
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 570
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 531 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 531 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 435

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 475
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

564
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1079 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1081 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 335
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1003
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 923

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1003
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 926
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 602 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 604 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 180
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 540

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 544
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 430 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

523
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1111 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 363
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1021
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1025
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 626 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 627 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 434 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 435 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 373
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

429
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1051 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1049 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 349
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 959
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 956
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 607 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 608 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 203

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 561
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 562
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 213 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 67
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 188
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 398 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 395 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 127
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 352
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 352
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 144
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 145
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

410
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1689
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1864
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1537
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1589
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

330
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1695
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

311
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1888
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

319
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1389
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1666
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1498
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1690
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

338
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1797
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1923
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 179
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 390
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1711
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

318
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1487
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1579
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

328
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1686
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1849
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1917
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

191
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

217
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

213
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

346
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

382
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

75
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

350
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

696
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 216
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

320
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 345
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

323
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 67%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1696
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1711
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1639
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1749
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1760
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1688
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1845
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1845
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1745
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 100

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1666
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1680
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1691
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -11

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1801
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1810
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1693
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 117

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1887
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1899
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1816
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 83

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 358
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 363
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 375
Mean Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

693
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 357
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 362
Mean Scale Score
RODGERS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

687
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 376
Mean Scale Score
Here:

707
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 372
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 90%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Riverview, FL
  5. Rodgers Middle School in Riverview, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.