All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Enterprise, NV Tony Alamo Elementary School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
Tony Alamo Elementary School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
64 .
Address:
Principal: Rodney Kissinger
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-2590
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 799-2622
Website: schools.ccsd.net/alamo
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate
Special Programs: Full-Day Kindergarten: Yes
Other nearby schools ratings: Tony Alamo Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Clark County:
41Enterprise:
57Tony Alamo Elementary School:
64
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Pacific Islander:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Pacific Islander:
89.3%Asian:
86.0%White:
85.0%All Students:
77.6%Limited English Proficiency Students:
75.2%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
71.7%Hispanic:
64.7%Black:
63.6%Individual Education Plan Students:
51.4%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%Asian:
100.0%Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Pacific Islander:
100.0%Two or more Races:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient Asian:
75.5%White:
75.4%Pacific Islander:
75.0%All Students:
68.3%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
64.8%Black:
61.1%Limited English Proficiency Students:
60.6%Individual Education Plan Students:
33.8%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Asian:
96.9%Pacific Islander:
96.5%Limited English Proficiency Students:
96.2%Two or more Races:
96.1%All Students:
95.8%White:
95.8%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
95.5%American Indian:
95.2%Black:
95.1%Hispanic:
94.7%Individual Education Plan Students:
92.2%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3 Students Tested: 167
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
7.2%Nevada:
10.3%
Approaches Standard This School:
20.4%State:
20.3%
Meets Standard This School:
31.7%State:
31.9%
Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 167 6.6% 3.5% 7.2% 10.3% 20.4% 20.3% 31.7% 31.9% 40.7% 37.5% Male 83 7.6% 3.8% 8.4% 11.1% 18.1% 19.2% 32.5% 30.7% 41.0% 39.0% Female 84 5.5% 3.2% 6.0% 9.5% 22.6% 21.5% 31.0% 33.1% 40.5% 36.0% Asian 40 14.1% 17.9% 0.0% 3.5% 20.0% 12.8% 30.0% 27.6% 50.0% 56.2% Hispanic 32 -15.9% -2.7% 9.4% 12.5% 40.6% 24.3% 21.9% 33.0% 28.1% 30.2% Black 21 -18.3% -16.7% 33.3% 21.7% 19.1% 29.1% 42.9% 30.6% 4.8% 18.6% White 54 21.1% 13.5% 1.9% 6.0% 11.1% 14.6% 31.5% 31.5% 55.6% 47.8% Two or more Races 11 -2.3% 6.8% 9.1% 8.0% 27.3% 19.2% 36.4% 31.7% 27.3% 41.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 30 7.4% -5.4% 6.7% 13.8% 20.0% 25.8% 16.7% 32.0% 56.7% 28.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 0.8% -4.6% 14.3% 13.9% 19.1% 24.8% 31.8% 32.6% 34.9% 28.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 13.1% 0.4% 5.1% 11.5% 15.9% 22.2% 37.0% 34.9% 42.0% 31.4% Male 75 14.1% 0.7% 2.7% 11.6% 17.3% 21.7% 38.7% 33.9% 41.3% 32.8% Female 63 11.9% 0.1% 7.9% 11.3% 14.3% 22.7% 34.9% 35.9% 42.9% 30.0% Asian 41 26.8% 13.3% 0.0% 5.7% 7.3% 15.1% 31.7% 32.5% 61.0% 46.6% Hispanic 35 5.5% -6.3% 2.9% 14.1% 25.7% 26.4% 31.4% 35.7% 40.0% 23.9% Black 20 -0.9% -17.1% 25.0% 22.8% 10.0% 28.4% 60.0% 30.3% 5.0% 18.4% White 40 14.1% 9.8% 2.5% 6.9% 17.5% 17.5% 35.0% 35.9% 45.0% 39.8% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -40.9% -27.5% 33.3% 32.5% 41.7% 29.1% 16.7% 23.6% 8.3% 14.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 23 8.0% -10.5% 0.0% 15.8% 26.1% 28.7% 26.1% 35.5% 47.8% 19.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 3.3% -8.4% 7.7% 15.5% 23.1% 26.9% 40.4% 34.5% 28.8% 23.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 168 10.4% 4.2% 4.8% 6.5% 28.6% 33.0% 32.7% 31.3% 33.9% 29.2% Male 97 14.8% 6.0% 4.1% 6.6% 24.7% 31.0% 36.1% 31.3% 35.1% 31.1% Female 71 4.3% 2.2% 5.6% 6.4% 33.8% 35.1% 28.2% 31.3% 32.4% 27.2% Asian 49 15.1% 17.1% 4.1% 3.4% 24.5% 23.2% 24.5% 32.7% 46.9% 40.7% Hispanic 47 11.8% -4.0% 6.4% 8.1% 25.5% 39.6% 36.2% 30.3% 31.9% 22.0% Black 27 -11.9% -13.0% 7.4% 12.6% 48.1% 44.1% 25.9% 26.5% 18.5% 16.7% White 43 18.1% 14.7% 2.3% 3.7% 23.3% 25.3% 41.9% 33.2% 32.6% 37.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 48 4.1% -8.6% 4.2% 9.2% 35.4% 43.1% 43.8% 29.8% 16.7% 17.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 2.7% -5.3% 5.1% 9.2% 35.9% 39.8% 30.8% 29.9% 28.2% 21.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 170 4.9% 3.6% 7.1% 8.3% 31.8% 31.7% 29.4% 35.6% 31.8% 24.4% Male 84 8.0% 4.0% 9.5% 8.6% 26.2% 31.1% 33.3% 34.8% 31.0% 25.4% Female 86 1.8% 3.3% 4.7% 8.0% 37.2% 32.4% 25.6% 36.3% 32.6% 23.2% Asian 51 14.3% 17.3% 2.0% 3.9% 27.5% 22.5% 21.6% 36.4% 49.0% 37.2% Hispanic 46 -4.1% -5.3% 8.7% 10.4% 39.1% 38.6% 41.3% 34.5% 10.9% 16.5% Black 21 -8.7% -11.7% 14.3% 16.3% 38.1% 39.1% 28.6% 31.4% 19.0% 13.2% White 52 9.1% 13.8% 7.7% 5.0% 26.9% 24.9% 26.9% 37.5% 38.5% 32.6% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -48.0% -23.5% 41.7% 25.9% 50.0% 41.3% 0.0% 21.9% 8.3% 11.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 38 -8.9% -9.2% 7.9% 12.0% 44.7% 41.0% 28.9% 33.6% 18.4% 13.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 -14.3% -6.7% 16.0% 12.0% 42.0% 38.4% 22.0% 33.6% 20.0% 16.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 160 24.8% 12.4% 3.1% 8.8% 28.8% 35.5% 33.1% 33.7% 35.0% 22.1% Male 90 26.7% 13.0% 3.3% 9.6% 26.7% 34.2% 27.8% 32.6% 42.2% 23.7% Female 69 23.4% 11.9% 2.9% 8.0% 30.4% 36.9% 40.6% 34.8% 26.1% 20.3% Asian 48 33.8% 26.3% 0.0% 3.9% 22.9% 26.5% 27.1% 35.9% 50.0% 33.6% Hispanic 33 11.2% 3.1% 6.1% 11.3% 39.4% 42.3% 36.4% 31.6% 18.2% 14.8% Black 21 13.8% -4.2% 9.5% 17.8% 33.3% 43.1% 38.1% 28.3% 19.0% 10.8% White 54 28.9% 23.4% 1.9% 5.0% 25.9% 28.3% 33.3% 36.8% 38.9% 30.0% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -18.3% -12.3% 33.3% 25.8% 41.7% 43.1% 8.3% 19.4% 16.7% 11.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 22 15.8% -3.5% 4.5% 13.7% 36.4% 46.6% 31.8% 28.4% 27.3% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 8.9% 2.2% 6.5% 12.3% 41.3% 42.2% 37.0% 31.2% 15.2% 14.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 241 18.3% 5.1% 8.4% 10.8% 27.8% 38.7% 34.2% 32.2% 29.5% 18.3% Male 119 23.8% 5.6% 8.5% 11.5% 22.2% 37.6% 36.8% 32.0% 32.5% 18.9% Female 122 12.9% 4.7% 8.3% 10.1% 33.3% 39.8% 31.7% 32.4% 26.7% 17.7% Asian 72 25.4% 18.9% 5.6% 5.7% 23.6% 30.0% 36.1% 36.8% 34.7% 27.5% Hispanic 47 -5.0% -6.7% 17.0% 14.5% 42.6% 46.8% 34.0% 27.8% 6.4% 10.9% Black 26 -12.1% -11.5% 25.0% 20.6% 41.7% 45.5% 20.8% 24.9% 12.5% 9.0% White 93 32.9% 17.4% 2.2% 6.0% 19.6% 31.2% 35.9% 37.2% 42.4% 25.6% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -9.7% -17.8% 21.4% 28.4% 42.9% 44.0% 28.6% 18.9% 7.1% 8.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -6.4% -15.4% 17.1% 18.1% 43.9% 51.9% 29.3% 23.1% 9.8% 6.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 -0.7% -7.6% 25.5% 15.7% 29.8% 46.5% 25.5% 27.2% 19.1% 10.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 14.8% 5.6% 6.9% 11.8% 32.9% 37.3% 29.2% 28.4% 31.0% 22.6% Male 105 16.5% 7.5% 5.7% 11.9% 32.4% 35.2% 31.4% 28.2% 30.5% 24.6% Female 111 13.7% 3.9% 8.2% 11.4% 32.7% 39.3% 27.3% 28.6% 31.8% 20.7% Asian 52 27.1% 20.6% 2.0% 5.6% 25.5% 28.4% 23.5% 33.3% 49.0% 32.7% Hispanic 44 16.0% -7.0% 9.1% 16.1% 29.5% 45.5% 38.6% 25.6% 22.7% 12.9% Black 27 -8.4% -12.4% 14.8% 22.3% 48.1% 44.7% 18.5% 20.9% 18.5% 12.1% White 91 15.0% 17.6% 6.6% 6.9% 33.0% 30.1% 30.8% 31.6% 29.7% 31.5% Individual Education Plan Students 17 -21.9% -19.1% 17.6% 29.6% 58.8% 44.2% 11.8% 16.2% 11.8% 10.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 31 21.3% -13.9% 3.3% 19.0% 30.0% 49.5% 36.7% 22.6% 30.0% 8.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 3.8% -7.2% 12.7% 16.9% 38.1% 45.0% 28.6% 25.1% 20.6% 13.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 186 23.7% 10.4% 9.2% 12.3% 32.6% 42.7% 31.0% 24.5% 27.2% 20.4% Male 87 27.6% 11.8% 8.0% 13.1% 29.9% 40.6% 33.3% 24.7% 28.7% 21.6% Female 98 19.7% 9.1% 10.4% 11.5% 35.4% 44.9% 29.2% 24.3% 25.0% 19.3% Asian 46 36.6% 22.6% 4.4% 5.9% 24.4% 37.0% 26.7% 27.8% 44.4% 29.3% Hispanic 42 15.5% -2.9% 11.9% 17.8% 38.1% 50.6% 40.5% 19.9% 9.5% 11.6% Black 17 -3.2% -7.9% 25.0% 23.6% 43.8% 49.8% 25.0% 17.9% 6.3% 8.7% White 72 29.4% 22.2% 8.3% 7.0% 27.8% 36.3% 31.9% 28.8% 31.9% 28.0% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -13.1% -12.5% 35.7% 30.5% 42.9% 47.5% 21.4% 14.2% 0.0% 7.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 12.7% -12.4% 5.6% 22.5% 47.2% 55.4% 36.1% 15.8% 11.1% 6.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 17.4% -2.6% 15.4% 17.7% 32.7% 50.4% 32.7% 20.2% 19.2% 11.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
61.6%Nevada:
55.4%
Exceeds Standard This School:
13.7%State:
14.1%
Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 146 9.4% 3.6% 4.1% 7.2% 20.6% 23.3% 61.6% 55.4% 13.7% 14.1% Male 78 9.7% 3.2% 2.6% 7.7% 21.8% 23.3% 62.8% 55.0% 12.8% 14.1% Female 68 9.1% 4.0% 5.9% 6.6% 19.1% 23.4% 60.3% 55.9% 14.7% 14.1% Asian 38 18.3% 19.4% 5.3% 2.5% 10.5% 12.3% 63.2% 56.8% 21.1% 28.5% Hispanic 43 3.9% -3.0% 2.3% 8.8% 27.9% 28.2% 65.1% 53.9% 4.7% 9.0% Black 16 -9.6% -14.3% 12.5% 15.6% 31.3% 32.8% 56.3% 46.4% 0.0% 5.2% White 34 13.5% 12.5% 2.9% 4.2% 17.7% 17.5% 61.8% 58.9% 17.7% 19.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 7.3% -5.3% 4.9% 9.8% 22.0% 29.6% 61.0% 52.1% 12.2% 8.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 2.4% -4.5% 4.8% 9.9% 27.0% 28.7% 61.9% 52.8% 6.4% 8.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 132 5.3% 0.5% 3.8% 8.0% 25.0% 25.6% 62.9% 57.5% 8.3% 8.9% Male 86 2.7% -0.3% 4.7% 8.5% 26.7% 25.9% 60.5% 56.2% 8.1% 9.5% Female 46 10.2% 1.3% 2.2% 7.5% 21.7% 25.2% 67.4% 58.9% 8.7% 8.4% Asian 45 18.5% 13.0% 0.0% 4.0% 15.6% 17.1% 71.1% 62.1% 13.3% 16.8% Hispanic 32 -6.5% -6.8% 9.4% 9.6% 31.3% 31.3% 56.3% 53.9% 3.1% 5.2% Black 19 -8.0% -15.8% 0.0% 16.0% 42.1% 33.9% 57.9% 47.1% 0.0% 3.0% White 35 8.4% 9.8% 5.7% 5.0% 20.0% 19.3% 62.9% 62.9% 11.4% 12.8% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -35.9% -30.1% 0.0% 26.0% 70.0% 38.2% 30.0% 32.9% 0.0% 2.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 31 -7.8% -17.1% 12.9% 13.1% 29.0% 38.2% 58.1% 46.5% 0.0% 2.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 3.7% -9.1% 4.3% 11.4% 26.1% 31.9% 60.9% 51.8% 8.7% 5.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 23.7% 8.0% 4.0% 8.1% 16.0% 27.6% 42.9% 32.4% 37.1% 31.9% Male 86 25.1% 7.6% 3.5% 8.4% 15.1% 27.7% 46.5% 32.1% 34.9% 31.8% Female 89 22.4% 8.3% 4.5% 7.8% 16.9% 27.6% 39.3% 32.7% 39.3% 32.0% Asian 55 36.4% 23.2% 0.0% 3.4% 7.3% 17.1% 32.7% 32.2% 60.0% 47.3% Hispanic 46 11.1% 0.0% 6.5% 10.3% 26.1% 33.4% 52.2% 32.4% 15.2% 23.9% Black 21 0.8% -7.3% 9.5% 15.1% 33.3% 35.9% 28.6% 30.6% 28.6% 18.4% White 53 30.5% 17.0% 3.8% 4.9% 9.4% 21.8% 50.9% 32.9% 35.8% 40.5% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -36.3% -22.2% 30.0% 27.9% 50.0% 38.1% 20.0% 22.2% 0.0% 11.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 28 0.8% -9.5% 10.7% 13.9% 32.1% 39.3% 42.9% 30.4% 14.3% 16.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 17.2% -1.7% 6.1% 11.4% 20.4% 34.0% 46.9% 31.7% 26.5% 22.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 146 22.5% 9.9% 3.4% 9.3% 17.8% 24.5% 41.8% 38.7% 37.0% 27.4% Male 85 24.9% 9.5% 4.7% 10.2% 14.1% 24.0% 44.7% 38.1% 36.5% 27.7% Female 61 19.1% 10.3% 1.6% 8.4% 23.0% 25.1% 37.7% 39.4% 37.7% 27.2% Asian 48 37.4% 23.2% 0.0% 3.9% 6.3% 16.6% 37.5% 36.7% 56.3% 42.8% Hispanic 31 17.9% 2.1% 9.7% 11.8% 16.1% 29.8% 51.6% 38.8% 22.6% 19.6% Black 20 -1.3% -5.9% 5.0% 17.7% 40.0% 31.9% 45.0% 35.2% 10.0% 15.2% White 44 21.0% 19.0% 2.3% 5.7% 20.5% 19.0% 38.6% 39.8% 38.6% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -3.0% -19.7% 20.0% 30.0% 26.7% 33.5% 33.3% 25.6% 20.0% 11.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 16 6.2% -7.4% 12.5% 15.4% 25.0% 35.7% 37.5% 36.2% 25.0% 12.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 12.1% -0.1% 5.3% 13.3% 26.3% 30.5% 52.6% 37.5% 15.8% 18.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 172 35.8% 21.0% 3.5% 9.9% 17.4% 25.8% 39.5% 35.6% 39.5% 28.7% Male 99 35.5% 20.3% 4.0% 10.8% 17.2% 25.6% 44.4% 34.6% 34.3% 29.0% Female 73 36.2% 21.8% 2.7% 8.9% 17.8% 26.0% 32.9% 36.7% 46.6% 28.4% Asian 59 38.1% 34.9% 0.0% 4.7% 18.6% 17.1% 32.2% 34.8% 49.2% 43.4% Hispanic 36 37.3% 11.5% 5.6% 13.4% 13.9% 31.8% 38.9% 35.0% 41.7% 19.7% Black 18 6.7% 4.6% 16.7% 18.6% 33.3% 33.5% 38.9% 31.8% 11.1% 16.1% White 56 40.6% 31.5% 1.8% 5.3% 14.3% 19.8% 46.4% 37.3% 37.5% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 13 10.5% -8.5% 7.7% 29.9% 38.5% 35.3% 23.1% 23.3% 30.8% 11.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 25 16.7% -1.2% 4.0% 18.9% 36.0% 38.9% 36.0% 30.7% 24.0% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 29.4% 10.4% 6.1% 14.5% 21.2% 31.8% 39.4% 34.8% 33.3% 18.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5 Students Tested: 152
This School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
13.2%State:
14.5%
Exceeds Standard This School:
12.5%Nevada:
5.2%
Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
9.8%State:
3.3%
Pacific Islander This School:
15.9%State:
1.2%
Black
This School : State :
White This School:
10.3%Nevada:
11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students
This School : Nevada :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 152 9.8% 3.3% 11.2% 16.4% 13.2% 14.5% 63.2% 64.0% 12.5% 5.2% Male 92 5.8% 1.9% 10.9% 17.3% 17.4% 14.9% 60.9% 62.4% 10.9% 5.4% Female 60 15.8% 4.8% 11.7% 15.3% 6.7% 14.0% 66.7% 65.8% 15.0% 4.8% Asian 41 19.5% 19.0% 4.9% 6.4% 9.8% 8.7% 63.4% 73.1% 22.0% 11.8% Pacific Islander 11 15.9% 1.2% 9.1% 19.3% 9.1% 13.6% 63.6% 62.2% 18.2% 4.9% Hispanic 33 3.8% -2.0% 15.2% 19.5% 15.2% 16.5% 63.6% 60.5% 6.1% 3.5% Black 17 -1.2% -15.6% 5.9% 31.1% 29.4% 18.7% 52.9% 48.9% 11.8% 1.4% White 42 10.3% 11.0% 14.3% 10.7% 9.5% 12.3% 66.7% 70.0% 9.5% 6.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 53 5.8% -4.4% 15.1% 21.7% 13.2% 16.8% 66.0% 58.1% 5.7% 3.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 59 0.2% -4.5% 11.9% 21.7% 22.0% 16.9% 52.5% 58.3% 13.6% 3.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 152 13.7% 0.6% 8.6% 16.2% 11.8% 17.3% 69.7% 60.4% 9.9% 6.1% Male 77 15.9% -0.6% 6.5% 17.3% 11.7% 17.4% 71.4% 59.0% 10.4% 6.3% Female 75 11.4% 1.8% 10.7% 15.0% 12.0% 17.2% 68.0% 61.8% 9.3% 5.9% Asian 44 29.6% 14.4% 0.0% 8.0% 4.5% 11.7% 72.7% 67.9% 22.7% 12.4% Hispanic 38 -0.1% -6.2% 13.2% 19.9% 21.1% 20.5% 65.8% 56.3% 0.0% 3.4% Black 26 -0.5% -15.8% 23.1% 27.9% 11.5% 22.1% 57.7% 47.5% 7.7% 2.6% White 43 17.8% 9.3% 4.7% 10.8% 11.6% 14.0% 76.7% 66.7% 7.0% 8.5% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -38.6% -33.4% 54.5% 45.6% 18.2% 21.9% 27.3% 31.1% 0.0% 1.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -1.6% -22.7% 14.3% 31.1% 21.4% 25.7% 64.3% 42.1% 0.0% 1.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 53 2.0% -8.5% 15.1% 21.7% 17.0% 20.9% 58.5% 54.0% 9.4% 3.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 143 17.1% 5.9% 0.7% 4.0% 25.9% 33.8% 46.9% 45.7% 26.6% 16.5% Male 75 17.0% 4.7% 0.0% 4.8% 26.7% 34.2% 41.3% 44.8% 32.0% 16.3% Female 68 17.2% 7.1% 1.5% 3.3% 25.0% 33.3% 52.9% 46.6% 20.6% 16.8% Asian 52 22.5% 19.8% 0.0% 1.7% 21.2% 22.3% 40.4% 47.8% 38.5% 28.2% Hispanic 27 6.7% -2.7% 3.7% 5.3% 33.3% 41.1% 44.4% 42.4% 18.5% 11.2% Black 20 8.7% -10.7% 0.0% 8.5% 35.0% 45.9% 50.0% 38.0% 15.0% 7.6% White 42 19.9% 16.0% 0.0% 2.1% 23.8% 25.5% 52.4% 50.4% 23.8% 21.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -1.8% -20.5% 0.0% 8.5% 45.5% 55.7% 45.5% 31.7% 9.1% 4.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 41 9.6% -4.5% 2.4% 5.8% 31.7% 42.5% 58.5% 41.2% 7.3% 10.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 8.3% 5.3% 2.9% 5.9% 32.6% 32.5% 50.3% 48.4% 14.3% 13.2% Male 93 14.7% 4.4% 3.2% 6.6% 25.8% 32.6% 54.8% 47.6% 16.1% 13.1% Female 82 1.0% 6.2% 2.4% 5.1% 40.2% 32.5% 45.1% 49.3% 12.2% 13.2% Asian 63 19.9% 19.0% 3.2% 2.6% 20.6% 22.2% 57.1% 51.8% 19.0% 23.4% Hispanic 37 -10.4% -3.9% 2.7% 7.7% 51.4% 39.9% 40.5% 44.3% 5.4% 8.2% Black 21 -27.7% -12.0% 4.8% 11.2% 66.7% 44.5% 23.8% 38.5% 4.8% 5.8% White 52 22.5% 15.5% 1.9% 3.5% 19.2% 24.7% 59.6% 54.1% 19.2% 17.7% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -23.0% -30.4% 33.3% 23.7% 33.3% 50.4% 33.3% 22.5% 0.0% 3.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -24.5% -18.9% 13.6% 12.2% 54.5% 50.4% 27.3% 33.9% 4.5% 3.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -10.1% -5.1% 5.1% 8.5% 48.7% 40.3% 38.5% 43.5% 7.7% 7.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 169 20.0% 15.1% 5.3% 6.7% 31.4% 34.8% 51.5% 46.9% 11.8% 11.6% Male 93 20.1% 14.1% 5.4% 7.9% 31.2% 34.8% 53.8% 45.9% 9.7% 11.5% Female 76 19.9% 16.3% 5.3% 5.5% 31.6% 34.9% 48.7% 47.9% 14.5% 11.7% Asian 53 35.9% 29.6% 3.8% 3.4% 17.0% 23.7% 58.5% 53.0% 20.8% 19.9% Hispanic 34 -5.1% 4.8% 8.8% 9.0% 52.9% 42.9% 38.2% 41.4% 0.0% 6.7% Black 18 12.3% -3.2% 5.6% 13.3% 38.9% 46.6% 55.6% 35.2% 0.0% 4.8% White 58 20.5% 26.5% 5.2% 3.7% 31.0% 26.6% 48.3% 53.6% 15.5% 16.1% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -13.3% -19.8% 10.0% 24.8% 60.0% 51.8% 30.0% 20.8% 0.0% 2.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -23.3% -15.8% 25.0% 16.3% 55.0% 56.2% 20.0% 25.7% 0.0% 1.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 -0.4% 3.3% 8.6% 9.8% 48.6% 43.6% 42.9% 40.4% 0.0% 6.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 219 18.0% 9.3% 5.1% 8.2% 31.5% 37.2% 48.1% 41.5% 15.3% 13.2% Male 115 18.3% 7.9% 6.2% 9.2% 30.1% 37.6% 46.9% 40.9% 16.8% 12.4% Female 104 17.7% 10.7% 3.9% 7.2% 33.0% 36.7% 49.5% 42.0% 13.6% 14.1% Asian 69 25.6% 24.4% 2.9% 3.5% 26.1% 26.7% 46.4% 47.2% 24.6% 22.6% Hispanic 57 10.7% -2.0% 3.5% 10.6% 40.4% 46.0% 49.1% 36.1% 7.0% 7.3% Black 18 -1.0% -9.6% 11.1% 16.4% 44.4% 47.7% 27.8% 30.5% 16.7% 5.3% White 71 20.3% 20.8% 7.1% 5.0% 27.1% 28.9% 52.9% 47.7% 12.9% 18.5% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -25.4% -24.6% 20.0% 29.6% 60.0% 49.6% 20.0% 18.1% 0.0% 2.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -2.5% -22.2% 17.9% 18.9% 39.3% 58.0% 35.7% 21.0% 7.1% 2.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 64 9.4% -4.3% 8.1% 12.2% 37.1% 46.7% 46.8% 34.5% 8.1% 6.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 208 8.0% 5.1% 5.3% 9.2% 41.3% 40.3% 40.3% 38.1% 13.1% 12.4% Male 120 0.4% 3.8% 7.5% 10.8% 46.7% 40.0% 32.5% 37.1% 13.3% 12.1% Female 86 20.1% 6.7% 2.4% 7.5% 32.1% 40.4% 52.4% 39.3% 13.1% 12.7% Asian 40 14.6% 21.6% 0.0% 3.8% 40.0% 29.2% 37.5% 46.5% 22.5% 20.5% Hispanic 61 -0.4% -8.3% 6.7% 12.6% 48.3% 50.4% 33.3% 31.2% 11.7% 5.9% Black 36 -8.3% -13.2% 5.7% 17.4% 57.1% 50.5% 31.4% 27.6% 5.7% 4.6% White 68 20.8% 17.5% 5.9% 5.5% 27.9% 31.7% 54.4% 44.7% 11.8% 18.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -15.4% -23.4% 5.0% 18.5% 65.0% 59.4% 20.0% 19.8% 10.0% 2.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 4.6% -8.8% 9.1% 13.6% 40.9% 49.8% 40.9% 30.6% 9.1% 6.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 185 21.4% 15.2% 7.8% 8.4% 36.3% 41.9% 43.6% 39.7% 12.3% 10.0% Male 100 22.3% 13.3% 7.4% 9.7% 35.8% 42.4% 45.3% 37.6% 11.6% 10.2% Female 81 20.5% 17.3% 6.3% 6.8% 38.8% 41.4% 41.3% 41.9% 13.8% 9.9% Asian 42 38.7% 29.7% 2.4% 4.3% 24.4% 31.6% 43.9% 47.2% 29.3% 17.0% Hispanic 32 -2.2% 2.5% 9.7% 11.2% 58.1% 51.8% 32.3% 32.5% 0.0% 4.5% Black 20 23.4% -3.6% 5.3% 16.1% 36.8% 52.9% 52.6% 27.5% 5.3% 3.4% White 83 20.5% 26.1% 8.8% 5.2% 36.3% 34.2% 46.3% 46.3% 8.8% 14.3% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -234.5% -18.0% -100.0% 31.4% -100.0% 52.1% -100.0% 14.1% -100.0% 2.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 0.8% -9.9% 5.9% 16.1% 58.8% 59.3% 23.5% 22.9% 11.8% 1.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 3.8% 2.2% 10.6% 12.4% 51.1% 50.9% 25.5% 32.2% 12.8% 4.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3 Students Tested: 167
This School:
100.0%State:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 167 2.7% -5.5% 13.8% 21.5% 19.8% 20.2% 41.3% 32.6% 25.2% 25.7% Male 83 -3.6% -8.6% 16.9% 24.2% 22.9% 20.6% 38.6% 31.8% 21.7% 23.4% Female 84 8.8% -2.3% 10.7% 18.7% 16.7% 19.8% 44.1% 33.5% 28.6% 28.0% Asian 40 8.7% 10.7% 10.0% 10.4% 17.5% 15.1% 47.5% 33.9% 25.0% 40.6% Hispanic 32 -23.2% -16.6% 28.1% 28.9% 31.3% 23.9% 28.1% 30.8% 12.5% 16.4% Black 21 -1.9% -22.0% 23.8% 33.7% 14.3% 24.4% 47.6% 28.5% 14.3% 13.4% White 54 12.1% 7.9% 9.3% 12.6% 14.8% 15.7% 40.7% 35.2% 35.2% 36.6% Two or more Races 11 8.9% 3.4% 0.0% 14.4% 27.3% 18.4% 54.6% 35.4% 18.2% 31.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 30 2.9% -22.3% 13.3% 33.5% 20.0% 25.0% 46.7% 29.0% 20.0% 12.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 2.9% -16.9% 14.3% 29.2% 19.1% 23.8% 36.5% 30.8% 30.2% 16.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 138 6.5% -3.0% 1.4% 3.4% 28.3% 35.8% 37.7% 34.7% 32.6% 26.1% Male 75 4.2% -6.5% 1.3% 4.0% 30.7% 38.7% 41.3% 33.3% 26.7% 24.0% Female 63 9.2% 0.7% 1.6% 2.8% 25.4% 32.7% 33.3% 36.1% 39.7% 28.4% Asian 41 16.7% 11.4% 0.0% 1.3% 19.5% 23.5% 31.7% 37.2% 48.8% 37.9% Hispanic 35 -3.8% -13.9% 2.9% 4.6% 37.1% 45.5% 28.6% 33.8% 31.4% 16.1% Black 20 -3.8% -16.9% 0.0% 5.7% 40.0% 47.4% 50.0% 30.6% 10.0% 16.3% White 40 11.2% 9.2% 0.0% 1.9% 25.0% 25.1% 45.0% 36.2% 30.0% 36.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 23 -7.3% -22.2% 0.0% 5.5% 43.5% 52.8% 26.1% 31.5% 30.4% 10.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 -4.2% -14.1% 1.9% 4.9% 38.5% 45.4% 30.8% 33.1% 28.8% 16.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 168 7.8% 8.3% 4.8% 4.4% 35.7% 35.5% 38.1% 37.2% 21.4% 22.9% Male 97 4.0% 4.7% 8.2% 5.6% 36.1% 38.0% 39.2% 35.5% 16.5% 20.9% Female 71 13.1% 12.2% 0.0% 3.2% 35.2% 32.8% 36.6% 38.9% 28.2% 25.0% Asian 49 23.8% 18.5% 8.2% 2.2% 16.3% 27.6% 49.0% 39.8% 26.5% 30.4% Hispanic 47 -4.9% -3.3% 4.3% 6.3% 48.9% 45.3% 29.8% 34.7% 17.0% 13.7% Black 27 -18.4% -5.6% 0.0% 6.7% 66.7% 47.1% 25.9% 32.9% 7.4% 13.2% White 43 20.4% 21.6% 4.7% 2.4% 23.3% 24.3% 41.9% 40.2% 30.2% 33.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 48 -12.1% -11.9% 2.1% 7.8% 58.3% 52.5% 31.3% 32.3% 8.3% 7.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -10.7% -3.8% 2.6% 6.5% 56.4% 45.6% 25.6% 34.6% 15.4% 13.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 170 12.4% 6.9% 3.5% 6.1% 32.4% 35.3% 31.8% 33.5% 32.4% 25.1% Male 84 11.4% 3.2% 4.8% 7.1% 32.1% 38.0% 32.1% 32.4% 31.0% 22.5% Female 86 13.4% 10.8% 2.3% 5.1% 32.6% 32.5% 31.4% 34.7% 33.7% 27.7% Asian 51 22.8% 20.2% 2.0% 3.1% 23.5% 25.0% 27.5% 36.5% 47.1% 35.4% Hispanic 46 -3.9% -5.6% 6.5% 8.9% 45.7% 45.0% 26.1% 31.2% 21.7% 15.0% Black 21 0.7% -5.4% 4.8% 8.3% 42.9% 45.4% 33.3% 30.9% 19.0% 15.4% White 52 21.4% 19.8% 1.9% 3.5% 25.0% 25.0% 40.4% 36.0% 32.7% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -43.4% -25.4% 16.7% 23.2% 75.0% 50.5% 8.3% 16.4% 0.0% 10.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 38 -9.6% -14.3% 5.3% 11.2% 52.6% 51.4% 28.9% 28.6% 13.2% 8.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 50 -3.7% -5.8% 8.0% 9.0% 44.0% 45.2% 16.0% 31.0% 32.0% 14.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 160 29.2% 19.7% 1.3% 7.0% 30.0% 33.7% 43.1% 43.1% 25.6% 16.2% Male 90 27.1% 15.5% 1.1% 8.6% 32.2% 36.3% 37.8% 40.6% 28.9% 14.5% Female 69 31.4% 24.1% 1.4% 5.4% 27.5% 30.9% 49.3% 45.7% 21.7% 18.0% Asian 48 33.3% 32.7% 0.0% 2.8% 27.1% 24.9% 39.6% 49.8% 33.3% 22.5% Hispanic 33 21.0% 7.4% 3.0% 10.2% 36.4% 42.9% 51.5% 38.6% 9.1% 8.4% Black 21 3.3% 6.8% 4.8% 10.5% 52.4% 43.1% 23.8% 36.3% 19.0% 10.2% White 54 40.0% 32.6% 0.0% 3.9% 20.4% 24.0% 48.1% 47.9% 31.5% 24.3% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -22.9% -10.3% 16.7% 24.6% 66.7% 46.1% 16.7% 22.4% 0.0% 6.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 22 33.1% -3.6% 0.0% 13.4% 27.3% 50.6% 50.0% 31.9% 22.7% 4.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 10.4% 6.5% 2.2% 10.5% 47.8% 43.4% 43.5% 37.6% 6.5% 8.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 241 23.3% 11.3% 5.0% 10.7% 32.1% 38.4% 30.0% 29.5% 32.9% 21.4% Male 119 18.9% 7.5% 4.2% 12.6% 37.3% 40.3% 29.7% 27.4% 28.8% 19.7% Female 122 27.6% 15.2% 5.7% 8.8% 27.0% 36.4% 30.3% 31.7% 36.9% 23.1% Asian 72 25.7% 24.7% 8.3% 5.4% 26.4% 30.3% 33.3% 35.0% 31.9% 29.3% Hispanic 47 0.8% -3.3% 8.5% 16.4% 51.1% 47.2% 23.4% 25.1% 17.0% 11.3% Black 26 2.7% -2.3% 3.8% 15.1% 53.8% 47.6% 23.1% 25.0% 19.2% 12.3% White 93 39.7% 25.1% 1.1% 5.7% 19.6% 29.6% 33.7% 33.5% 45.7% 31.2% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -11.0% -17.1% 7.1% 32.2% 64.3% 45.3% 14.3% 14.5% 14.3% 8.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -5.5% -15.3% 14.6% 21.4% 51.2% 54.2% 24.4% 19.1% 9.8% 5.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 47 0.8% -3.2% 8.5% 16.2% 51.1% 47.4% 23.4% 25.1% 17.0% 11.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 20.1% 4.8% 6.5% 12.3% 33.8% 43.2% 36.6% 29.9% 23.1% 14.6% Male 105 16.2% 1.8% 7.7% 14.2% 36.5% 44.4% 35.6% 28.2% 20.2% 13.3% Female 111 24.4% 8.2% 5.4% 10.3% 30.6% 41.9% 37.8% 31.8% 26.1% 16.1% Asian 52 36.9% 17.7% 0.0% 5.5% 23.5% 37.1% 47.1% 36.3% 29.4% 21.1% Hispanic 44 10.4% -12.2% 9.1% 19.5% 40.9% 53.1% 34.1% 21.7% 15.9% 5.7% Black 27 8.5% -7.6% 11.1% 18.4% 40.7% 49.6% 25.9% 24.5% 22.2% 7.4% White 91 20.8% 19.4% 7.7% 6.3% 31.9% 34.7% 36.3% 36.7% 24.2% 22.3% Individual Education Plan Students 17 -16.1% -21.0% 35.3% 34.8% 41.2% 46.6% 11.8% 13.9% 11.8% 4.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 31 13.7% -22.1% 3.3% 24.8% 43.3% 57.7% 36.7% 14.9% 16.7% 2.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 10.4% -10.0% 9.7% 18.7% 40.3% 51.8% 37.1% 23.1% 12.9% 6.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 186 27.4% 17.2% 7.6% 10.7% 37.5% 44.6% 36.4% 28.0% 18.5% 16.8% Male 87 19.6% 13.6% 2.3% 12.6% 50.6% 46.2% 29.9% 26.5% 17.2% 14.7% Female 98 34.0% 20.9% 12.5% 8.6% 26.0% 43.0% 42.7% 29.5% 18.8% 18.9% Asian 46 48.1% 27.7% 2.2% 4.7% 22.2% 40.1% 51.1% 33.5% 24.4% 21.8% Hispanic 42 1.1% -1.2% 9.5% 18.0% 61.9% 55.7% 26.2% 19.9% 2.4% 6.4% Black 17 3.7% 3.1% 12.5% 15.4% 56.3% 54.0% 18.8% 23.4% 12.5% 7.3% White 72 35.0% 31.7% 6.9% 5.4% 30.6% 35.4% 37.5% 33.7% 25.0% 25.5% Individual Education Plan Students 14 -13.2% -8.8% 35.7% 30.3% 50.0% 51.1% 7.1% 13.3% 7.1% 5.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 8.6% -13.9% 8.3% 24.3% 55.6% 62.1% 33.3% 11.6% 2.8% 2.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 20.6% 1.3% 11.5% 16.1% 40.4% 55.1% 30.8% 21.2% 17.3% 7.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4 Students Tested: 146
Tony Alamo Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 146 8.8% -1.1% 12.3% 15.9% 13.0% 19.3% 54.1% 46.3% 20.6% 18.5% Male 78 7.2% -5.4% 14.1% 19.0% 12.8% 20.5% 51.3% 44.7% 21.8% 15.9% Female 68 10.6% 3.4% 10.3% 12.7% 13.2% 18.0% 57.4% 48.0% 19.1% 21.3% Asian 38 18.3% 13.5% 10.5% 7.4% 5.3% 13.2% 68.4% 52.0% 15.8% 27.4% Hispanic 43 3.9% -10.8% 11.6% 21.5% 18.6% 23.4% 48.8% 43.4% 20.9% 11.7% Black 16 -28.4% -18.2% 31.3% 26.0% 31.3% 26.3% 31.3% 38.5% 6.3% 9.2% White 34 13.5% 10.9% 8.8% 9.1% 11.8% 14.1% 58.8% 50.0% 20.6% 26.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 4.8% -16.6% 22.0% 25.4% 7.3% 25.3% 51.2% 40.0% 19.5% 9.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 63 -2.4% -11.4% 15.9% 21.7% 20.6% 23.8% 52.4% 43.1% 11.1% 11.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 132 0.0% -0.8% 6.1% 7.4% 28.0% 27.5% 35.6% 41.6% 30.3% 23.5% Male 86 -3.1% -4.2% 9.3% 9.3% 27.9% 29.1% 40.7% 41.0% 22.1% 20.6% Female 46 5.8% 2.8% 0.0% 5.4% 28.3% 25.8% 26.1% 42.1% 45.7% 26.6% Asian 45 3.0% 9.1% 6.7% 3.4% 24.4% 21.6% 33.3% 43.8% 35.6% 31.2% Hispanic 32 -9.6% -11.7% 3.1% 10.1% 40.6% 35.6% 25.0% 39.4% 31.3% 14.9% Black 19 -2.7% -14.0% 5.3% 12.6% 31.6% 35.5% 47.4% 38.5% 15.8% 13.4% White 35 8.4% 11.4% 8.6% 4.2% 17.1% 18.5% 42.9% 43.9% 31.4% 33.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 31 -33.6% -27.9% 6.5% 14.5% 61.3% 47.4% 25.8% 33.1% 6.5% 5.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 46 -0.7% -11.7% 8.7% 10.7% 26.1% 35.1% 34.8% 39.6% 30.4% 14.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 11.7% 5.8% 8.0% 9.1% 24.0% 28.9% 42.3% 46.2% 25.7% 15.8% Male 86 8.8% 1.8% 9.3% 11.1% 25.6% 30.7% 38.4% 44.6% 26.7% 13.6% Female 89 14.5% 9.9% 6.7% 6.9% 22.5% 26.9% 46.1% 48.0% 24.7% 18.2% Asian 55 27.3% 16.1% 1.8% 4.2% 14.5% 23.4% 47.3% 48.1% 36.4% 24.3% Hispanic 46 -4.1% -6.3% 8.7% 12.6% 39.1% 37.3% 45.7% 41.4% 6.5% 8.7% Black 21 -3.9% -7.0% 28.6% 13.6% 19.0% 37.1% 38.1% 41.1% 14.3% 8.2% White 53 15.4% 18.8% 5.7% 5.4% 22.6% 19.4% 35.8% 52.0% 35.8% 23.1% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -46.3% -30.5% 70.0% 37.2% 20.0% 37.0% 10.0% 21.0% 0.0% 4.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -27.7% -22.7% 17.9% 18.2% 53.6% 48.2% 25.0% 31.2% 3.6% 2.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 0.8% -6.1% 18.4% 13.0% 24.5% 36.8% 44.9% 41.3% 12.2% 8.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 146 12.9% 0.8% 6.8% 11.7% 24.0% 31.2% 46.6% 41.7% 22.6% 15.4% Male 85 8.4% -3.8% 8.2% 14.4% 27.1% 33.1% 42.4% 39.0% 22.4% 13.5% Female 61 19.1% 5.7% 4.9% 8.8% 19.7% 29.2% 52.5% 44.6% 23.0% 17.4% Asian 48 31.2% 13.9% 0.0% 5.9% 12.5% 24.0% 52.1% 46.7% 35.4% 23.5% Hispanic 31 5.0% -10.9% 16.1% 15.7% 22.6% 38.9% 58.1% 37.4% 3.2% 8.0% Black 20 -11.3% -12.3% 15.0% 18.3% 40.0% 37.6% 35.0% 35.2% 10.0% 8.9% White 44 14.2% 13.0% 4.5% 7.1% 25.0% 23.5% 40.9% 46.6% 29.5% 22.8% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -16.3% -32.9% 33.3% 40.8% 26.7% 35.8% 26.7% 18.3% 13.3% 5.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -6.3% -26.3% 12.5% 22.6% 37.5% 47.5% 50.0% 27.2% 0.0% 2.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 -14.2% -11.8% 13.2% 17.1% 44.7% 38.4% 34.2% 36.7% 7.9% 7.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 172 28.2% 14.5% 6.4% 13.0% 22.1% 29.2% 54.7% 41.5% 16.9% 16.3% Male 99 26.4% 9.4% 8.1% 16.1% 22.2% 31.1% 55.6% 38.3% 14.1% 14.5% Female 73 30.7% 19.9% 4.1% 9.7% 21.9% 27.1% 53.4% 44.9% 20.5% 18.2% Asian 59 27.9% 26.5% 3.4% 6.7% 25.4% 23.5% 50.8% 48.4% 20.3% 21.4% Hispanic 36 23.4% 0.9% 11.1% 18.6% 22.2% 37.2% 58.3% 36.6% 8.3% 7.6% Black 18 6.7% 1.2% 22.2% 19.7% 27.8% 35.8% 33.3% 34.6% 16.7% 9.9% White 56 37.1% 28.0% 1.8% 7.4% 17.9% 21.2% 62.5% 46.4% 17.9% 24.9% Individual Education Plan Students 13 10.5% -18.7% 15.4% 41.4% 30.8% 34.0% 46.2% 19.3% 7.7% 5.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 25 0.7% -18.4% 16.0% 27.7% 40.0% 47.4% 40.0% 23.6% 4.0% 1.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 23.4% 0.6% 9.1% 19.2% 24.2% 36.9% 54.5% 36.2% 12.1% 7.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5 Students Tested: 152
Tony Alamo Elementary School:
100.0%State:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
12.5%State:
17.2%
Approaches Standard This School:
21.1%Nevada:
20.1%
Meets Standard This School:
42.1%State:
38.9%
Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : State :
Male
This School : State :
Pacific Islander
This School : State :
Black
Here : Nevada :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 152 0.6% -3.2% 12.5% 17.2% 21.1% 20.1% 42.1% 38.9% 24.3% 23.8% Male 92 -3.9% -7.4% 16.3% 20.7% 21.7% 20.7% 40.2% 37.3% 21.7% 21.2% Female 60 7.4% 1.2% 6.7% 13.5% 20.0% 19.4% 45.0% 40.5% 28.3% 26.6% Asian 41 2.4% 8.9% 9.8% 9.6% 22.0% 15.6% 41.5% 42.5% 26.8% 32.3% Pacific Islander 11 6.8% -6.1% 9.1% 16.9% 18.2% 23.4% 45.5% 40.2% 27.3% 19.6% Hispanic 33 -2.3% -13.3% 21.2% 22.8% 15.2% 24.6% 51.5% 37.2% 12.1% 15.5% Black 17 -7.1% -20.3% 11.8% 28.2% 29.4% 26.2% 35.3% 33.3% 23.5% 12.3% White 42 3.1% 9.3% 9.5% 10.1% 21.4% 14.7% 35.7% 41.1% 33.3% 34.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 53 -13.1% -19.8% 18.9% 27.4% 28.3% 26.5% 43.4% 34.7% 9.4% 11.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 59 0.2% -14.0% 15.3% 23.4% 18.6% 24.7% 47.5% 37.1% 18.6% 14.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 152 -7.3% -12.3% 7.2% 8.2% 34.2% 38.2% 41.4% 44.1% 17.1% 9.4% Male 77 -16.5% -14.8% 7.8% 9.9% 42.9% 38.9% 33.8% 42.9% 15.6% 8.2% Female 75 2.1% -9.8% 6.7% 6.4% 25.3% 37.5% 49.3% 45.4% 18.7% 10.7% Asian 44 20.5% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 13.6% 30.3% 45.5% 49.6% 40.9% 16.3% Hispanic 38 -29.1% -25.1% 10.5% 11.3% 52.6% 47.8% 34.2% 36.1% 2.6% 4.8% Black 26 -19.7% -27.0% 23.1% 13.1% 30.8% 48.0% 42.3% 34.3% 3.8% 4.6% White 43 -7.8% 1.6% 2.3% 4.8% 39.5% 27.7% 44.2% 53.6% 14.0% 14.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -44.5% -49.2% 21.4% 21.2% 57.1% 62.1% 21.4% 16.2% 0.0% 0.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 53 -16.8% -24.7% 17.0% 11.8% 34.0% 46.9% 34.0% 36.4% 15.1% 4.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 143 4.5% -4.4% 1.4% 8.6% 37.8% 39.4% 53.1% 43.4% 7.7% 8.5% Male 75 5.0% -7.9% 2.7% 10.8% 36.0% 40.8% 54.7% 41.2% 6.7% 7.2% Female 68 4.0% -0.7% 0.0% 6.4% 39.7% 38.0% 51.5% 45.7% 8.8% 9.9% Asian 52 16.8% 8.1% 1.9% 4.4% 25.0% 31.2% 65.4% 50.3% 7.7% 14.2% Hispanic 27 -8.2% -16.2% 3.7% 11.8% 48.1% 48.1% 40.7% 35.4% 7.4% 4.7% Black 20 -11.3% -18.9% 0.0% 15.2% 55.0% 47.4% 40.0% 33.0% 5.0% 4.4% White 42 8.0% 8.5% 0.0% 4.7% 35.7% 30.5% 54.8% 52.5% 9.5% 12.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -10.8% -39.1% 9.1% 20.9% 45.5% 61.8% 45.5% 16.7% 0.0% 0.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 41 -7.5% -17.1% 2.4% 12.4% 48.8% 48.4% 46.3% 34.9% 2.4% 4.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 -3.2% -9.7% 9.1% 11.5% 37.7% 41.8% 44.0% 39.0% 9.1% 7.6% Male 93 -3.6% -14.4% 8.6% 14.2% 38.7% 43.8% 45.2% 36.2% 7.5% 5.7% Female 82 -2.6% -4.8% 9.8% 8.7% 36.6% 39.8% 42.7% 41.9% 11.0% 9.6% Asian 63 -0.7% 1.5% 3.2% 6.3% 41.3% 35.9% 42.9% 46.5% 12.7% 11.3% Hispanic 37 -21.2% -23.5% 18.9% 16.9% 45.9% 50.3% 29.7% 29.4% 5.4% 3.4% Black 21 -23.0% -22.6% 14.3% 16.6% 52.4% 49.7% 28.6% 29.6% 4.8% 4.1% White 52 14.9% 4.1% 7.7% 6.5% 21.2% 33.1% 61.5% 48.7% 9.6% 11.7% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -48.0% -42.8% 50.0% 45.4% 41.7% 41.2% 8.3% 11.8% 0.0% 1.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -42.7% -44.2% 27.3% 29.3% 59.1% 58.6% 13.6% 11.5% 0.0% 0.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -15.3% -23.3% 17.9% 17.1% 41.0% 49.9% 38.5% 29.6% 2.6% 3.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 169 14.7% 8.2% 10.1% 9.5% 32.0% 39.0% 52.7% 44.7% 5.3% 6.8% Male 93 4.0% 4.1% 10.8% 11.7% 41.9% 40.9% 46.2% 42.5% 1.1% 4.9% Female 76 27.8% 12.6% 9.2% 7.1% 19.7% 37.1% 60.5% 47.0% 10.5% 8.8% Asian 53 20.9% 18.2% 7.5% 4.9% 28.3% 33.5% 60.4% 52.1% 3.8% 9.5% Hispanic 34 -2.1% -6.1% 14.7% 13.9% 44.1% 48.9% 38.2% 34.6% 2.9% 2.6% Black 18 6.7% -5.8% 16.7% 15.3% 33.3% 47.1% 44.4% 34.4% 5.6% 3.1% White 58 20.5% 22.3% 8.6% 4.9% 27.6% 29.4% 56.9% 54.7% 6.9% 10.9% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -33.3% -26.6% 40.0% 36.5% 50.0% 46.8% 0.0% 15.7% 10.0% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -38.3% -31.2% 40.0% 27.5% 55.0% 60.4% 5.0% 11.9% 0.0% 0.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 35 -3.3% -5.9% 20.0% 14.2% 40.0% 48.4% 37.1% 34.5% 2.9% 2.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 219 -3.4% -6.1% 11.9% 15.1% 46.1% 45.6% 39.7% 35.1% 2.3% 4.2% Male 115 -8.0% -10.0% 15.7% 18.1% 47.0% 46.6% 37.4% 32.2% 0.0% 3.2% Female 104 1.7% -2.2% 7.7% 12.1% 45.2% 44.7% 42.3% 38.1% 4.8% 5.1% Asian 69 3.9% 2.9% 4.3% 8.6% 46.4% 43.1% 44.9% 42.8% 4.3% 5.5% Hispanic 57 -15.6% -19.6% 10.5% 21.6% 59.6% 52.7% 28.1% 24.3% 1.8% 1.4% Black 18 -12.1% -22.9% 16.7% 25.2% 50.0% 52.2% 33.3% 20.9% 0.0% 1.6% White 71 1.1% 7.4% 16.9% 8.5% 36.6% 38.6% 45.1% 46.1% 1.4% 6.8% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -45.4% -34.8% 80.0% 47.5% 20.0% 41.9% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 28 -34.7% -37.7% 21.4% 41.4% 67.9% 50.9% 10.7% 7.4% 0.0% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 64 -20.4% -20.8% 17.2% 22.8% 57.8% 52.6% 25.0% 23.3% 0.0% 1.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 208 -6.6% -2.9% 14.1% 14.1% 47.1% 43.4% 36.4% 36.9% 2.4% 5.6% Male 120 -14.6% -5.6% 19.2% 16.7% 50.0% 43.5% 27.5% 34.9% 3.3% 4.9% Female 86 5.8% 0.2% 7.1% 11.1% 41.7% 43.3% 50.0% 39.2% 1.2% 6.4% Asian 40 4.6% 8.4% 10.0% 7.1% 40.0% 39.1% 47.5% 46.2% 2.5% 7.5% Hispanic 61 -17.1% -19.7% 18.3% 22.3% 53.3% 51.9% 23.3% 23.9% 5.0% 1.8% Black 36 -19.7% -19.8% 11.4% 22.5% 62.9% 51.9% 22.9% 23.4% 2.9% 2.1% White 68 3.1% 12.3% 13.2% 6.9% 38.2% 35.4% 48.5% 48.6% 0.0% 9.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -25.4% -35.3% 30.0% 35.9% 50.0% 54.0% 20.0% 9.8% 0.0% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 44 -18.1% -18.8% 4.5% 21.8% 68.2% 51.6% 22.7% 24.6% 4.5% 2.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 185 16.3% 9.0% 6.7% 12.5% 42.5% 43.9% 44.1% 37.3% 6.7% 6.3% Male 100 10.8% 5.8% 9.5% 14.8% 45.3% 44.9% 41.1% 35.4% 4.2% 4.9% Female 81 23.0% 12.5% 2.5% 10.0% 40.0% 43.0% 47.5% 39.3% 10.0% 7.7% Asian 42 25.0% 16.4% 2.4% 7.2% 38.1% 41.9% 52.4% 44.2% 7.1% 6.7% Hispanic 32 -8.7% -9.0% 12.9% 20.0% 61.3% 54.6% 25.8% 23.4% 0.0% 2.1% Black 20 -1.2% -7.4% 11.1% 20.5% 55.6% 52.4% 33.3% 25.4% 0.0% 1.7% White 83 25.5% 23.8% 5.0% 6.5% 35.0% 35.2% 50.0% 48.2% 10.0% 10.1% Individual Education Plan Students 10 -234.5% -21.7% -100.0% 43.3% -100.0% 43.8% -100.0% 11.7% -100.0% 1.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 -16.9% -23.8% 11.8% 30.7% 70.6% 58.6% 11.8% 10.4% 5.9% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 0.3% -6.8% 13.0% 19.1% 52.2% 53.1% 28.3% 25.4% 6.5% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 193 20.3% 1.9% 6.3% 13.8% 33.9% 44.7% 42.7% 34.4% 17.2% 7.1% Male 90 12.1% -5.7% 4.5% 18.1% 43.8% 48.0% 40.4% 29.5% 11.2% 4.4% Female 103 27.4% 9.7% 7.8% 9.4% 25.2% 41.3% 44.7% 39.5% 22.3% 9.7% Asian 49 35.9% 15.6% 2.0% 7.2% 22.4% 37.6% 44.9% 44.2% 30.6% 11.0% Hispanic 43 12.8% -10.6% 7.1% 20.9% 40.5% 50.1% 38.1% 25.8% 14.3% 3.2% Black 26 -1.1% -7.3% 11.5% 18.2% 50.0% 49.5% 34.6% 28.1% 3.8% 4.2% White 71 22.4% 11.0% 7.0% 8.6% 31.0% 40.8% 46.5% 40.7% 15.5% 10.0% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -32.5% -25.5% 28.6% 40.5% 64.3% 45.4% 7.1% 12.3% 0.0% 1.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 49 9.4% -14.1% 10.2% 23.5% 40.8% 51.0% 40.8% 23.0% 8.2% 2.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 10.4% -10.0% 2.6% 20.0% 47.4% 50.3% 36.8% 26.3% 13.2% 3.3% Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 171 19.3% 12.1% 11.1% 16.2% 42.1% 44.1% 39.2% 32.9% 7.6% 6.7% Male 83 1.4% 4.2% 15.7% 21.3% 55.4% 47.1% 26.5% 27.4% 2.4% 4.3% Female 88 36.1% 20.6% 6.8% 10.9% 29.5% 41.0% 51.1% 38.8% 12.5% 9.3% Asian 35 38.2% 27.4% 5.7% 9.7% 28.6% 35.4% 54.3% 42.8% 11.4% 12.1% Hispanic 34 13.7% 0.3% 11.8% 23.9% 47.1% 48.3% 35.3% 24.8% 5.9% 3.0% Black 26 11.0% 3.3% 15.4% 21.6% 46.2% 47.6% 26.9% 26.8% 11.5% 4.0% White 74 17.1% 20.5% 10.8% 10.5% 44.6% 41.4% 39.2% 38.8% 5.4% 9.2% Individual Education Plan Students 20 -17.5% -14.6% 40.0% 46.5% 50.0% 40.5% 10.0% 11.7% 0.0% 1.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 25 20.5% -3.6% 12.0% 27.4% 40.0% 48.7% 44.0% 21.5% 4.0% 2.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 16.1% 0.4% 15.4% 23.1% 41.0% 49.0% 30.8% 24.9% 12.8% 3.1% Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
50.0%State:
47.5%
Meets Standard This School:
37.3%Nevada:
40.7%
Tony Alamo Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : Nevada :
Male
Here : Nevada :
Asian
This School : Nevada :
Hispanic
This School : State :
Black
This School : State :
White
This School : State :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 -20.9% -18.6% 7.1% 7.3% 50.0% 47.5% 37.3% 40.7% 5.6% 4.5% Male 80 -30.9% -26.3% 10.1% 10.2% 57.0% 52.3% 27.9% 34.5% 5.1% 3.0% Female 47 -4.2% -10.3% 2.1% 4.2% 38.3% 42.3% 53.2% 47.3% 6.4% 6.2% Asian 28 -20.9% -2.0% 17.9% 2.7% 39.3% 35.5% 35.7% 51.7% 7.1% 10.1% Hispanic 29 -25.9% -27.2% 3.5% 9.3% 58.6% 54.0% 37.9% 34.3% 0.0% 2.3% Black 17 -28.5% -27.0% 0.0% 10.2% 64.7% 53.0% 23.5% 34.4% 11.8% 2.4% White 37 -16.6% -10.3% 2.8% 5.2% 50.0% 41.3% 38.9% 47.0% 8.3% 6.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 44 -36.5% -31.2% 11.4% 10.9% 61.4% 56.6% 22.7% 30.6% 4.6% 2.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 48 -36.1% -28.2% 10.6% 10.2% 61.7% 54.2% 19.2% 33.4% 8.5% 2.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 154 -2.2% -17.2% 4.0% 7.7% 34.4% 45.7% 49.7% 41.9% 11.9% 4.7% Male 78 -10.0% -25.2% 6.4% 10.6% 39.7% 50.8% 47.4% 35.6% 6.4% 2.9% Female 76 6.1% -8.8% 1.4% 4.7% 28.8% 40.3% 52.1% 48.5% 17.8% 6.5% Asian 43 10.6% -1.8% 0.0% 3.8% 25.6% 34.2% 44.2% 52.7% 30.2% 9.3% Hispanic 40 -3.3% -26.4% 5.3% 9.7% 34.2% 52.9% 60.5% 35.0% 0.0% 2.4% Black 28 -30.5% -27.0% 11.1% 10.6% 55.6% 52.6% 29.6% 34.1% 3.7% 2.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -35.2% -44.1% 14.3% 17.6% 57.1% 62.8% 21.4% 19.3% 7.1% 0.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 -13.8% -27.2% 12.0% 10.8% 38.0% 52.6% 44.0% 34.3% 6.0% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 140 18.3% -4.9% 2.1% 8.9% 27.9% 44.3% 49.3% 40.4% 20.7% 6.4% Male 74 15.9% -13.2% 4.1% 12.5% 28.4% 49.0% 48.6% 34.4% 18.9% 4.1% Female 66 21.0% 3.8% 0.0% 5.2% 27.3% 39.3% 50.0% 46.7% 22.7% 8.8% Asian 52 27.1% 10.1% 1.9% 5.4% 19.2% 32.8% 42.3% 49.4% 36.5% 12.5% Hispanic 25 8.3% -13.8% 4.0% 11.3% 36.0% 50.8% 52.0% 34.9% 8.0% 3.1% Black 20 18.3% -14.2% 0.0% 12.8% 30.0% 49.6% 50.0% 33.2% 20.0% 4.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 10 -1.7% -30.6% 0.0% 19.4% 50.0% 59.5% 40.0% 20.2% 10.0% 0.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 6.2% -15.5% 2.6% 12.6% 39.5% 51.2% 52.6% 33.2% 5.3% 3.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 173 -0.8% -7.5% 6.4% 9.8% 42.8% 46.0% 43.4% 38.8% 7.5% 5.3% Male 93 -6.5% -15.5% 7.5% 13.3% 47.3% 50.5% 40.9% 32.8% 4.3% 3.3% Female 80 5.8% 0.9% 5.0% 6.2% 37.5% 41.3% 46.3% 45.1% 11.3% 7.4% Asian 63 2.3% 6.4% 4.8% 5.2% 41.3% 36.7% 44.4% 48.0% 9.5% 10.1% Hispanic 37 -3.1% -18.0% 10.8% 13.8% 40.5% 52.5% 43.2% 31.2% 5.4% 2.5% Black 20 -16.7% -15.8% 10.0% 13.3% 55.0% 50.8% 30.0% 32.6% 5.0% 3.3% Individual Education Plan Students 12 -43.4% -38.3% 41.7% 38.2% 50.0% 48.4% 8.3% 12.6% 0.0% 0.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 22 -33.5% -34.2% 18.2% 23.3% 63.6% 59.2% 18.2% 17.0% 0.0% 0.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 41 -10.2% -19.0% 7.3% 14.3% 51.2% 53.0% 36.6% 30.5% 4.9% 2.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 166 22.3% 8.1% 9.7% 10.3% 28.4% 42.0% 43.9% 40.1% 18.1% 7.6% Male 90 10.4% -0.1% 14.6% 13.9% 35.4% 46.6% 39.0% 34.5% 11.0% 5.0% Female 76 35.7% 16.8% 4.1% 6.5% 20.5% 37.1% 49.3% 46.1% 26.0% 10.4% Asian 53 40.0% 22.0% 2.0% 5.2% 18.4% 33.2% 49.0% 48.1% 30.6% 13.5% Hispanic 30 8.7% -3.3% 13.8% 14.5% 37.9% 49.2% 44.8% 32.8% 3.4% 3.5% Black 16 0.4% 0.5% 20.0% 13.6% 40.0% 46.3% 33.3% 35.1% 6.7% 5.0% Individual Education Plan Students 11 -9.6% -23.9% 40.0% 37.6% 30.0% 46.7% 30.0% 14.2% 0.0% 1.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -24.2% -22.3% 23.1% 26.8% 61.5% 55.9% 15.4% 16.9% 0.0% 0.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 7.1% -3.5% 6.7% 15.0% 46.7% 48.9% 36.7% 32.8% 10.0% 3.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 220 19.5% 5.3% 4.1% 11.1% 36.8% 44.0% 48.6% 38.4% 10.5% 6.5% Male 114 17.4% -2.4% 6.1% 14.8% 36.8% 48.0% 49.1% 33.1% 7.9% 4.1% Female 106 21.7% 13.2% 1.9% 7.3% 36.8% 40.0% 48.1% 43.9% 13.2% 8.9% Asian 71 28.0% 18.1% 2.8% 5.2% 29.6% 37.1% 52.1% 46.2% 15.5% 11.5% Hispanic 57 11.3% -6.4% 3.5% 16.0% 45.6% 50.8% 43.9% 30.2% 7.0% 3.0% Black 19 13.0% -4.0% 10.5% 15.4% 36.8% 49.0% 42.1% 32.3% 10.5% 3.3% White 70 19.0% 14.8% 4.3% 7.1% 37.1% 38.5% 51.4% 45.3% 7.1% 9.1% Individual Education Plan Students 15 -39.6% -25.8% 33.3% 40.0% 66.7% 46.3% 0.0% 12.8% 0.0% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -12.0% -26.1% 10.3% 30.8% 62.1% 55.6% 24.1% 12.8% 3.4% 0.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 66 16.5% -7.2% 6.1% 16.4% 37.9% 51.2% 48.5% 29.8% 7.6% 2.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 150 7.7% 23.0% 19.0% 25.4% 32.4% 25.9% 40.8% 25.7% Male 88 8.5% 27.8% 25.6% 26.6% 25.6% 24.3% 40.2% 21.3% Female 62 6.7% 18.0% 10.0% 24.2% 41.7% 27.5% 41.7% 30.3% Asian 49 4.3% 10.0% 17.4% 18.1% 23.9% 27.0% 54.3% 44.9% Black 20 15.8% 33.3% 31.6% 26.8% 21.1% 22.5% 31.6% 17.3% White 48 6.5% 14.6% 13.0% 21.5% 32.6% 27.9% 47.8% 36.0% Individual Education Plan Students 21 25.0% 53.8% 43.8% 23.9% 18.8% 13.1% 12.5% 9.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 25.0% 42.6% 33.3% 33.4% 25.0% 18.1% 16.7% 5.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 8.8% 33.1% 32.4% 29.8% 35.3% 23.3% 23.5% 13.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 13.0% 22.9% 24.3% 24.2% 29.6% 25.4% 33.1% 27.5% Male 35 14.3% 27.7% 34.3% 25.4% 25.7% 24.0% 25.7% 22.9% Female 73 5.6% 17.9% 22.5% 23.1% 33.8% 26.8% 38.0% 32.2% Asian 57 1.8% 10.7% 25.0% 16.3% 32.1% 28.0% 41.1% 45.0% Black 19 42.1% 31.6% 26.3% 28.0% 5.3% 23.7% 26.3% 16.7% White 60 14.5% 14.0% 12.7% 19.8% 38.2% 27.6% 34.5% 38.5% Individual Education Plan Students 16 36.4% 52.9% 18.2% 23.7% 36.4% 14.2% 9.1% 9.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 24 18.2% 46.7% 27.3% 32.4% 54.5% 16.5% 0.0% 4.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 21.2% 33.6% 27.3% 29.3% 27.3% 22.6% 24.2% 14.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 14.6% 23.5% 19.2% 24.8% 28.6% 25.1% 37.6% 26.5% Male 114 20.9% 28.3% 20.9% 25.6% 28.2% 23.9% 30.0% 22.3% Female 103 7.8% 18.5% 17.5% 24.1% 29.1% 26.4% 45.6% 30.9% Asian 65 9.2% 10.4% 12.3% 18.5% 32.3% 27.6% 46.2% 43.5% Hispanic 46 17.8% 34.6% 31.1% 29.7% 26.7% 22.1% 24.4% 13.6% Black 21 28.6% 33.1% 23.8% 27.9% 19.0% 21.8% 28.6% 17.2% White 81 12.8% 14.3% 17.9% 21.0% 28.2% 27.9% 41.0% 36.8% Individual Education Plan Students 18 17.6% 52.4% 58.8% 25.4% 17.6% 13.4% 5.9% 8.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 20.0% 55.2% 45.0% 30.6% 35.0% 11.0% 0.0% 3.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 23.5% 35.0% 31.4% 29.2% 25.5% 21.7% 19.6% 14.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 195 15.6% 23.5% 21.4% 25.1% 24.0% 24.9% 39.1% 26.6% Male 92 16.9% 27.9% 18.0% 26.1% 27.0% 23.5% 38.2% 22.5% Female 103 14.6% 18.9% 24.3% 24.0% 21.4% 26.2% 39.8% 30.9% Asian 50 4.0% 10.8% 8.0% 18.4% 26.0% 27.1% 62.0% 43.7% Hispanic 44 15.9% 34.9% 38.6% 29.8% 22.7% 21.6% 22.7% 13.7% Black 28 33.3% 34.2% 33.3% 28.7% 22.2% 22.3% 11.1% 14.8% White 69 17.6% 14.5% 14.7% 21.7% 23.5% 27.3% 44.1% 36.5% Individual Education Plan Students 14 64.3% 53.7% 21.4% 24.7% 14.3% 13.6% 0.0% 8.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 20.0% 52.9% 48.6% 30.9% 22.9% 12.7% 8.6% 3.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 22.9% 35.3% 29.2% 30.0% 25.0% 21.1% 22.9% 13.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 151 17.2% 26.8% 21.2% 23.8% 27.2% 24.0% 34.4% 25.4% Male 76 23.7% 31.1% 23.7% 24.4% 27.6% 22.9% 25.0% 21.6% Female 75 10.7% 22.2% 18.7% 23.1% 26.7% 25.2% 44.0% 29.5% Asian 29 3.4% 12.6% 13.8% 17.9% 27.6% 29.0% 55.2% 40.5% Hispanic 28 17.9% 39.4% 39.3% 28.6% 21.4% 20.2% 21.4% 11.9% Black 19 31.6% 37.8% 21.1% 25.9% 5.3% 22.3% 42.1% 14.0% White 72 18.1% 17.5% 16.7% 20.6% 34.7% 26.3% 30.6% 35.5% Individual Education Plan Students 17 70.6% 57.0% 11.8% 23.0% 5.9% 12.1% 11.8% 7.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 5.9% 48.4% 41.2% 29.2% 47.1% 15.9% 5.9% 6.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 15.6% 38.2% 25.0% 28.3% 25.0% 21.0% 34.4% 12.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 150 7.9% 20.6% 20.9% 24.2% 33.1% 27.9% 38.1% 27.3% Male 88 8.8% 21.9% 18.8% 23.0% 31.3% 26.4% 41.3% 28.7% Female 62 6.8% 19.2% 23.7% 25.4% 35.6% 29.6% 33.9% 25.8% Asian 49 2.2% 10.1% 20.0% 18.9% 26.7% 28.9% 51.1% 42.2% Black 20 15.8% 34.3% 21.1% 27.1% 42.1% 23.1% 21.1% 15.6% White 48 8.7% 13.1% 17.4% 20.4% 32.6% 29.1% 41.3% 37.4% Individual Education Plan Students 21 26.7% 46.5% 26.7% 25.1% 33.3% 15.8% 13.3% 12.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 16.7% 34.0% 33.3% 31.8% 33.3% 24.0% 16.7% 10.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 12.1% 28.9% 24.2% 27.9% 45.5% 26.7% 18.2% 16.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 12.0% 20.8% 17.5% 24.4% 38.0% 27.4% 32.5% 27.3% Male 35 18.2% 21.6% 9.1% 23.6% 48.5% 26.1% 24.2% 28.7% Female 73 12.7% 20.0% 19.7% 25.3% 31.0% 28.7% 36.6% 26.0% Asian 57 3.6% 9.7% 21.4% 19.3% 30.4% 29.2% 44.6% 41.9% Black 19 42.1% 33.8% 26.3% 28.6% 15.8% 23.0% 15.8% 14.6% White 60 5.6% 12.7% 16.7% 20.2% 44.4% 28.8% 33.3% 38.3% Individual Education Plan Students 16 36.4% 46.5% 9.1% 24.6% 36.4% 16.6% 18.2% 12.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 24 18.2% 38.2% 31.8% 32.6% 31.8% 21.5% 18.2% 7.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 24.2% 29.7% 21.2% 29.1% 33.3% 25.5% 21.2% 15.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 13.1% 21.4% 19.2% 24.6% 29.6% 26.9% 38.0% 27.0% Male 114 16.4% 22.6% 20.0% 23.5% 23.6% 25.5% 40.0% 28.5% Female 103 9.7% 20.3% 18.4% 25.7% 35.9% 28.5% 35.9% 25.6% Asian 65 6.2% 10.8% 18.5% 20.7% 24.6% 27.8% 50.8% 40.7% Hispanic 46 20.0% 30.1% 24.4% 28.9% 22.2% 25.5% 33.3% 15.5% Black 21 28.6% 34.7% 23.8% 27.9% 38.1% 22.3% 9.5% 15.1% White 81 11.5% 13.0% 15.4% 20.8% 33.3% 28.9% 39.7% 37.3% Individual Education Plan Students 18 22.2% 46.2% 33.3% 26.1% 44.4% 16.2% 0.0% 11.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 25.0% 45.3% 30.0% 31.5% 30.0% 17.2% 15.0% 6.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 17.3% 31.5% 32.7% 29.1% 26.9% 24.2% 23.1% 15.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 195 13.5% 22.1% 22.4% 25.2% 25.5% 27.2% 38.5% 25.5% Male 92 13.3% 23.3% 16.7% 24.0% 24.4% 26.1% 45.6% 26.6% Female 103 13.7% 20.9% 27.5% 26.4% 26.5% 28.2% 32.4% 24.4% Asian 50 2.0% 11.4% 14.3% 20.2% 20.4% 30.4% 63.3% 38.0% Hispanic 44 11.6% 30.3% 37.2% 30.5% 27.9% 24.9% 23.3% 14.4% Black 28 35.7% 36.3% 28.6% 28.3% 25.0% 22.9% 10.7% 12.5% White 69 14.7% 14.4% 16.2% 21.2% 26.5% 29.3% 42.6% 35.0% Individual Education Plan Students 14 30.8% 48.9% 53.8% 24.5% 15.4% 16.4% 0.0% 10.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 17.6% 43.7% 38.2% 31.8% 26.5% 17.8% 17.6% 6.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 18.8% 31.9% 35.4% 30.0% 20.8% 24.0% 25.0% 14.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 151 15.9% 25.0% 21.2% 23.9% 33.1% 26.7% 29.8% 24.5% Male 76 23.7% 25.6% 22.4% 22.8% 34.2% 25.7% 19.7% 25.9% Female 75 8.0% 24.4% 20.0% 24.9% 32.0% 27.7% 40.0% 23.0% Asian 29 6.9% 14.5% 10.3% 17.9% 20.7% 31.4% 62.1% 36.2% Hispanic 28 21.4% 34.2% 28.6% 28.1% 35.7% 24.8% 14.3% 12.9% Black 19 21.1% 39.3% 31.6% 27.7% 26.3% 21.4% 21.1% 11.6% White 72 13.9% 16.8% 19.4% 20.8% 40.3% 28.5% 26.4% 34.0% Individual Education Plan Students 17 52.9% 51.5% 11.8% 24.3% 29.4% 15.1% 5.9% 9.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 17.6% 39.8% 23.5% 29.1% 41.2% 22.0% 17.6% 9.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 12.5% 34.8% 25.0% 28.0% 34.4% 23.9% 28.1% 13.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 150 9.8% 23.7% 29.4% 27.6% 29.4% 25.3% 31.5% 23.5% Male 88 12.2% 25.9% 28.0% 27.8% 28.0% 24.1% 31.7% 22.2% Female 62 6.6% 21.4% 31.1% 27.3% 31.1% 26.5% 31.1% 24.8% Asian 49 10.6% 13.4% 23.4% 26.1% 23.4% 30.3% 42.6% 30.2% Black 20 15.8% 31.9% 42.1% 30.0% 21.1% 23.9% 21.1% 14.2% White 48 6.4% 11.6% 23.4% 21.5% 34.0% 29.4% 36.2% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 21 33.3% 53.9% 26.7% 24.7% 20.0% 12.0% 20.0% 9.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 30.8% 51.7% 15.4% 34.9% 46.2% 11.1% 7.7% 2.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 14.7% 35.4% 44.1% 32.7% 29.4% 21.0% 11.8% 10.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 15.4% 24.8% 23.1% 27.0% 36.1% 24.8% 25.4% 23.4% Male 35 22.9% 26.9% 14.3% 27.2% 45.7% 23.5% 17.1% 22.4% Female 73 14.1% 22.6% 23.9% 26.9% 32.4% 26.1% 29.6% 24.4% Asian 57 10.7% 14.1% 32.1% 26.7% 30.4% 30.1% 26.8% 29.1% Black 19 26.3% 31.9% 47.4% 31.6% 15.8% 22.4% 10.5% 14.1% White 60 10.9% 11.5% 10.9% 21.6% 43.6% 29.7% 34.5% 37.2% Individual Education Plan Students 16 36.4% 54.0% 18.2% 24.4% 36.4% 12.8% 9.1% 8.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 24 40.9% 58.9% 40.9% 31.7% 13.6% 8.0% 4.5% 1.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 24.2% 37.9% 33.3% 31.7% 36.4% 20.1% 6.1% 10.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 14.4% 25.9% 26.0% 26.5% 33.0% 23.9% 26.5% 23.7% Male 114 16.1% 27.9% 29.5% 26.6% 25.9% 22.9% 28.6% 22.6% Female 103 12.6% 23.9% 22.3% 26.5% 40.8% 24.8% 24.3% 24.8% Asian 65 9.2% 15.0% 30.8% 25.4% 30.8% 31.1% 29.2% 28.5% Hispanic 46 23.9% 42.7% 23.9% 30.3% 39.1% 17.9% 13.0% 9.1% Black 21 28.6% 35.2% 23.8% 31.2% 23.8% 19.5% 23.8% 14.1% White 81 10.1% 11.9% 24.1% 22.3% 31.6% 28.5% 34.2% 37.3% Individual Education Plan Students 18 29.4% 53.0% 47.1% 26.1% 11.8% 12.7% 11.8% 8.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 50.0% 68.3% 40.0% 24.5% 10.0% 5.4% 0.0% 1.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 28.8% 40.0% 28.8% 30.7% 32.7% 18.6% 9.6% 10.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 195 21.8% 25.8% 22.3% 26.9% 28.5% 24.0% 27.5% 23.3% Male 92 26.4% 27.3% 18.7% 27.3% 28.6% 23.2% 26.4% 22.1% Female 103 17.6% 24.1% 25.5% 26.4% 28.4% 24.9% 28.4% 24.5% Asian 50 8.0% 15.7% 24.0% 26.6% 32.0% 31.3% 36.0% 26.4% Hispanic 44 25.6% 43.2% 39.5% 31.3% 23.3% 17.0% 11.6% 8.5% Black 28 46.4% 35.1% 21.4% 31.6% 17.9% 22.0% 14.3% 11.4% White 69 19.1% 12.5% 11.8% 22.4% 30.9% 28.5% 38.2% 36.5% Individual Education Plan Students 14 64.3% 53.6% 28.6% 25.9% 7.1% 12.5% 0.0% 8.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 31.4% 65.6% 48.6% 26.0% 20.0% 6.9% 0.0% 1.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 27.1% 40.3% 37.5% 31.0% 18.8% 18.7% 16.7% 10.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 151 14.6% 27.4% 29.8% 27.0% 20.5% 21.2% 35.1% 24.4% Male 76 19.7% 28.7% 36.8% 27.6% 19.7% 20.5% 23.7% 23.2% Female 75 9.3% 26.0% 22.7% 26.4% 21.3% 21.9% 46.7% 25.6% Asian 29 10.3% 16.1% 17.2% 28.1% 31.0% 28.0% 41.4% 27.8% Hispanic 28 17.9% 46.3% 42.9% 30.3% 17.9% 15.0% 21.4% 8.4% Black 19 26.3% 37.3% 36.8% 32.1% 5.3% 18.0% 31.6% 12.6% White 72 12.5% 13.9% 26.4% 23.3% 20.8% 25.2% 40.3% 37.5% Individual Education Plan Students 17 23.5% 54.6% 64.7% 27.4% 5.9% 10.3% 5.9% 7.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 23.5% 58.9% 35.3% 28.5% 41.2% 9.5% 0.0% 3.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 15.6% 41.5% 34.4% 30.9% 28.1% 16.7% 21.9% 11.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tony Alamo Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 150 11.2% 19.9% 25.2% 26.8% 39.2% 31.5% 24.5% 21.8% Male 88 12.0% 21.4% 20.5% 26.2% 42.2% 29.8% 25.3% 22.6% Female 62 10.0% 18.2% 31.7% 27.6% 35.0% 33.3% 23.3% 20.9% Asian 49 8.5% 13.2% 21.3% 22.9% 38.3% 35.2% 31.9% 28.7% Black 20 26.3% 29.7% 42.1% 33.6% 10.5% 26.2% 21.1% 10.5% White 48 2.2% 11.8% 26.1% 19.6% 43.5% 34.4% 28.3% 34.2% Individual Education Plan Students 21 26.7% 34.7% 53.3% 31.4% 20.0% 22.3% 0.0% 11.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 13 30.8% 35.4% 30.8% 38.4% 23.1% 22.2% 15.4% 4.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 38 20.0% 28.0% 40.0% 33.0% 31.4% 28.2% 8.6% 10.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 175 18.0% 21.4% 25.7% 26.8% 37.1% 30.8% 19.2% 21.1% Male 35 23.5% 22.7% 20.6% 26.0% 50.0% 29.2% 5.9% 22.1% Female 73 16.9% 20.0% 28.2% 27.6% 33.8% 32.5% 21.1% 20.0% Asian 57 10.7% 14.1% 35.7% 23.9% 33.9% 36.2% 19.6% 25.7% Black 19 52.6% 33.1% 15.8% 31.7% 15.8% 25.2% 15.8% 10.0% White 60 9.3% 11.9% 22.2% 20.2% 42.6% 34.6% 25.9% 33.2% Individual Education Plan Students 16 36.4% 35.7% 27.3% 30.8% 27.3% 22.3% 9.1% 11.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 24 27.3% 41.0% 40.9% 37.9% 27.3% 18.4% 4.5% 2.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 33.3% 30.7% 33.3% 32.5% 30.3% 26.7% 3.0% 10.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 217 21.9% 22.4% 22.3% 26.3% 34.0% 30.7% 21.9% 20.6% Male 114 23.7% 23.7% 23.7% 25.6% 31.6% 29.4% 21.1% 21.3% Female 103 19.8% 21.1% 20.8% 27.1% 36.6% 31.9% 22.8% 19.9% Asian 65 16.9% 14.1% 20.0% 25.5% 41.5% 36.4% 21.5% 24.0% Hispanic 46 32.6% 33.0% 23.9% 32.3% 32.6% 25.6% 10.9% 9.1% Black 21 28.6% 33.3% 23.8% 30.7% 33.3% 26.0% 14.3% 10.0% White 81 17.7% 12.6% 24.1% 20.4% 27.8% 34.8% 30.4% 32.2% Individual Education Plan Students 18 41.2% 36.7% 17.6% 31.5% 23.5% 22.0% 17.6% 9.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 20 55.0% 48.1% 25.0% 35.9% 20.0% 13.8% 0.0% 2.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 52 33.3% 32.4% 29.4% 32.2% 23.5% 25.9% 13.7% 9.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 195 24.4% 22.7% 21.2% 27.3% 33.7% 30.2% 20.7% 19.8% Male 92 25.3% 23.8% 17.6% 27.0% 36.3% 28.9% 20.9% 20.2% Female 103 23.5% 21.5% 24.5% 27.6% 31.4% 31.5% 20.6% 19.4% Asian 50 8.0% 14.8% 28.0% 27.5% 34.0% 33.8% 30.0% 23.9% Hispanic 44 34.9% 33.2% 25.6% 33.5% 34.9% 25.2% 4.7% 8.0% Black 28 46.4% 35.6% 32.1% 32.7% 21.4% 23.5% 0.0% 8.2% White 69 20.6% 13.2% 10.3% 21.5% 36.8% 34.7% 32.4% 30.5% Individual Education Plan Students 14 69.2% 37.1% 23.1% 33.3% 7.7% 19.9% 0.0% 9.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 44.1% 47.2% 26.5% 35.3% 26.5% 14.9% 2.9% 2.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 49 35.4% 32.7% 27.1% 33.4% 25.0% 25.0% 12.5% 9.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 151 17.9% 22.4% 19.9% 24.1% 35.1% 33.2% 27.2% 20.4% Male 76 22.4% 23.9% 18.4% 23.5% 36.8% 31.7% 22.4% 21.0% Female 75 13.3% 20.8% 21.3% 24.7% 33.3% 34.7% 32.0% 19.8% Asian 29 0.0% 14.3% 31.0% 24.0% 34.5% 39.8% 34.5% 21.9% Hispanic 28 17.9% 32.3% 28.6% 30.9% 32.1% 28.4% 21.4% 8.4% Black 19 26.3% 33.4% 31.6% 30.7% 21.1% 27.7% 21.1% 8.3% White 72 20.8% 14.1% 8.3% 17.9% 41.7% 36.8% 29.2% 31.2% Individual Education Plan Students 17 35.3% 38.7% 29.4% 28.7% 29.4% 24.2% 5.9% 8.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 17 11.8% 38.6% 52.9% 34.3% 23.5% 23.0% 11.8% 4.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 12.5% 31.4% 34.4% 30.3% 34.4% 29.0% 18.8% 9.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Enterprise, NV Tony Alamo Elementary School in Enterprise, Nevada (NV)
-15.9%
-2.7%
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: