More election tampering...Soros buys 2nd largest U.S. radio corp (speech, money)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The libs in this thread are so transparent and hypocritical. When Musk took over Twitter, you would have thought it was the end of the world from them!
I didn't care about Twitter before then, and i don't care about X now. Don't even have an account. He can run that thing into the ground, for all I care.
I too share the general concern that a politically active wealthy person is purchasing a large media conglomerate. While it's too soon to know how Soros will influence the direction of the radio stations he has purchased, we can look at what's happened at the television stations bought by Sinclair Broadcasting - in particular during the period when stations were required to run an opinion segment from Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn - as an example not to follow. We may also see a change in real time as Sinclair CEO David Smith and conservative commentator Armstrong Williams take ownership of the Baltimore Sun.
Just as hilarious as believing format changes don't happen all the time, and that their 30 NEWS/TALK stations are inconsequential, or that the existing Music Format channels never mention politics or political figures.
Are you familiar with modern music stations? Sounds like you haven't listened to radio since the 80s. Most music stations don't have news at all anymore. Some of them don't have DJs anymore. You're hearing either music or advertisements. Mostly advertisements.
Yeah, 30 news stations out of more than 200. What an impact they must make. Dontcha just hate how political they get when giving traffic updates or weather reports, which is at least 25 percent of each hour.
I wish someone would change the formats of the sports gambling stations. Annoying.
There are plenty of whack job right wing sources. Is being paranoid amd outraged as exhausting as it is for me to be a woke, liberal, communist, Marxist, socialist, leftist?
Very few have any meaningful following. Nice try
Nothing compared the the mainstream whackjob Media.
You ever drive through the heartland of America and listen to the radio? Every single station is either Christian radio or right-wing talk shows. Spare us the outrage.
Same in NY, all right wing radio including Giuliani having his own spot.
It's generally hard to take people seriously when they use words like Marxist so I was asking for clarification. Marxist is so overused it's lost meaning these days. Along with the others I've mentioned.
That's a quote from Soros. That's how HE defined himself. He derives this title from his , also self proclaimed, "abstract philosophical ideas". Take issue with him, for ill defining himself. By the way, I couldn't give two shi*'s if you take it seriously.
Soros says, "the thoughts of these participants are part of the reality about which they have to think". Every Marxist understands these insights as aspects of dialectical materialism, and even Soros feels that he must explain that "the only reason I do not use 'the word' more prominently is that I do not want to be burdened by the excess baggage that comes with it". Soros's notion of an 'excess baggage' carried by Marxist philosophy is based on his distorted perception that "Marx propounded a deterministic theory of history".
That's a quote from Soros. That's how HE defined himself. He derives this title from his , also self proclaimed, "abstract philosophical ideas". Take issue with him, for ill defining himself. By the way, I couldn't give two shi*'s if you take it seriously.
Soros says, "the thoughts of these participants are part of the reality about which they have to think". Every Marxist understands these insights as aspects of dialectical materialism, and even Soros feels that he must explain that "the only reason I do not use 'the word' more prominently is that I do not want to be burdened by the excess baggage that comes with it". Soros's notion of an 'excess baggage' carried by Marxist philosophy is based on his distorted perception that "Marx propounded a deterministic theory of history".
Fair enough. Generally speaking those words are meaningless. In this case, I won't argue with you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.