Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
well add georgia to the list.my people please, please, do your research. listen, i am here in ga. ga is a reublican state, there nothing here for adults to do, and people mostly migrate downtown for any activity, the beach (not man made) is over 4hrs away. I am from the north and I am leaving to go back to the north. but dont take my word for it, see for yourself.........whatuwanttoknow4@yahoo.com
Am I missing something here? Like what this post has to do in any way shape or form with the dead thread he posted it in.
Actually "right to work" is a good thing. It means you can't be forced to join a union, even in a predominately unionized setting. Here in PA (a non right to work state) teachers and others who choose to not join a union still have to pay all the dues even though they are not members.
Nobody can force you to join a union, you have the choice to refuse the job if you have to join a union to get it. That's called a "condition of employment". There are many such conditions, depending on the job of course.
Note too that so called "right to work" laws force the union to represent people who refuse to join it and dictate the non union members make the same money and conditions as the union members. In other words such laws protect freeloaders and deadbeats. Why don't such laws grant the non union worker the right to work for less money than the union members?
Nobody can force you to join a union, you have the choice to refuse the job if you have to join a union to get it. That's called a "condition of employment". There are many such conditions, depending on the job of course.
Note too that so called "right to work" laws force the union to represent people who refuse to join it and dictate the non union members make the same money and conditions as the union members. In other words such laws protect freeloaders and deadbeats. Why don't such laws grant the non union worker the right to work for less money than the union members?
Actually most "Right to work" states do not have it written where the union has to represent the non-union employees. If an employee chooses NOT to join the union and doesn't pay union dues, then they are not represented and do NOT have the benefit of union protection like union members do. I have worked in both right to work and other states. NEVER been in an area that the union speaks for non-union members. They like to SAY they do, but they DON'T. The employers are not bound by union contracts in regards to non-union employees. They have the right to pay non-union workers less, but it is done on an individual basis and not part of the collective bargaining agreement that is between the union and the employer.
Not much new to offer.
At Will means an employer does not have to maintain you as a employee and can dismiss you for "no cause".
On the other hand you can bail anytime you want. Notices are nice but not necessary considering.
Google Federal Labor Laws to see the range of exceptions the employer must watch closely. Age, Sex, Discrimination, etc.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
