Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2007, 12:29 PM
 
229 posts, read 879,469 times
Reputation: 155

Advertisements

I read not too long ago on another site that EVERY US state employement is "at-will". True? Or only a few select states are?

In these so-called "at will" states, wouldn't than mean that pretty much all employment there is "temporary"?

If employers can fire and hire without any reason, then what is the prupose of the ACLU? Why would most lawyers even bother?

Whats the point of having protected classes in these "at will" states? Most of the employers would lie and find a way to fire someone anyway.

When did states become "at will"?

sorry for all the questions. It just seems that I have been hearing the term "at-will" a lot lately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2007, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA/Lk Hopatcong NJ
13,406 posts, read 28,741,978 times
Reputation: 12072
Not sure if all states are at will
But a collective bargaining contract (union) would void that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Kingman AZ
15,370 posts, read 39,127,019 times
Reputation: 9215
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkate View Post
Not sure if all states are at will
But a collective bargaining contract (union) would void that
OR doing your job well.....I live in an AT WILL state [Nevada]. I work for an AT WILL Company [no union, no contract, no nuttin]. I have done this for 21 years this coming April 29th. I have never once feared for my job because I WORK for the company.

All I would have gained by a UNION is to have a contract that my EMPLOYER would also have and make me abide by to the letter of the contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Kingman AZ
15,370 posts, read 39,127,019 times
Reputation: 9215
Quote:
Originally Posted by cathy J. View Post
If employers can fire and hire without any reason, then what is the prupose of the ACLU? Why would most lawyers even bother?

Whats the point of having protected classes in these "at will" states? Most of the employers would lie and find a way to fire someone anyway.
A good question.....I have NEVER seen a lot of value in the ACLU. They are why we have people passing our porno literature on our streets. [peopla LOVE to badrap Las Vegas but it's the ACLU that does it.]

It's not in an employers best interest to fire someone "just for the hell of it" Firing and subsequent rehiring is extremely expensive.

YOU are your own best Union....if you don't like the job go to another one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 02:41 PM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,720,243 times
Reputation: 26860
Even in an "at will" state an employer cannot violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

The term "at will" is usually used to mean that an employer does not have to show good cause or give due process to terminate an employee. As mentioned above, a union contract might provide an employee with due process rights she would not otherwise have and many government or civil service jobs have good cause or due process requirements for termination. These are exceptions to the "at will" doctrine of employment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 02:58 PM
 
267 posts, read 1,361,519 times
Reputation: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
Even in an "at will" state an employer cannot violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

The term "at will" is usually used to mean that an employer does not have to show good cause or give due process to terminate an employee. As mentioned above, a union contract might provide an employee with due process rights she would not otherwise have and many government or civil service jobs have good cause or due process requirements for termination. These are exceptions to the "at will" doctrine of employment.
True but there are exceptions to everything.

My sister is a supervisor for a large factory that makes light bulbs. She had to fire a woman recently on orders from her boss. Problem? The woman had severe Bipolar. She simply refused to take her medication, came to work and said things like "...I wanna bust you in the f*cking mouth !!" "..I wish I had a gun with me and I would kill everyone !!".

My sister's boss got wind of the concerns from the other employees and my sister and her boss talked to this woman about the situation. They told her if she wanted to continue to work there, she has to control her anger and take her meds. The woman refused to correct the situation and she is out of a job.

Could she sue because her firing was due to her disabilty? Maybe but in this case, I doubt she would win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 03:06 PM
 
5,652 posts, read 19,357,366 times
Reputation: 4119
Yeah they care fire at will. But most smart companies still document any problems they have with employees carefully to avoid lawsuits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 03:16 PM
 
16,579 posts, read 20,720,243 times
Reputation: 26860
Quote:
Originally Posted by billybobwv View Post
True but there are exceptions to everything.

My sister is a supervisor for a large factory that makes light bulbs. She had to fire a woman recently on orders from her boss. Problem? The woman had severe Bipolar. She simply refused to take her medication, came to work and said things like "...I wanna bust you in the f*cking mouth !!" "..I wish I had a gun with me and I would kill everyone !!".

My sister's boss got wind of the concerns from the other employees and my sister and her boss talked to this woman about the situation. They told her if she wanted to continue to work there, she has to control her anger and take her meds. The woman refused to correct the situation and she is out of a job.

Could she sue because her firing was due to her disabilty? Maybe but in this case, I doubt she would win.
The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination based on disability, but the person has to show that she can do the job despite the disability. Most likely in the situation you described, the employer would respond that getting along with co-workers is an essential part of the job and she is unable to do it.

A classic ADA case is a situation where someone can do a job despite a disability if either the employer makes some accomodations (such as installing ramps for a wheel-chair bound employee) or a situation in which someone is perceived as being unable to do a job because of their disability when they really can do the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 04:05 PM
 
267 posts, read 1,361,519 times
Reputation: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
Even in an "at will" state an employer cannot violate federal anti-discrimination laws.

The term "at will" is usually used to mean that an employer does not have to show good cause or give due process to terminate an employee. As mentioned above, a union contract might provide an employee with due process rights she would not otherwise have and many government or civil service jobs have good cause or due process requirements for termination. These are exceptions to the "at will" doctrine of employment.
forgot to add something earlier...

If I am not mistaken, its against federal anti-discrimination laws to discrimate based on marriage and/or with children. Back in the 1940s and 1950s, it was common to see help wanted ads with "only married men need apply" attached to it. Today such practice is illegal.

However today most companies when it comes to hiring/firing, marriage isn't a factor however when it comes to senority among the staff it really is. Many businesses will NOT put someone who is married and/or with children on the "night shift".

The company I used to work for ( was there for 24 years ), every year I had to work on hoilidays including Christmas and Thanksgiving. Everytime I tried to get those days off I was denied becuase I wasn't married ( they told me this ), even though I had more senority than just about everyone there as far as time on job went, but because I wasn't married, that flew out the window. The company told me they have to give married folks first choice when it comes to getting time off because they are "family friendly".

Way around anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2007, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,774,755 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynimagelv View Post
A good question.....I have NEVER seen a lot of value in the ACLU. They are why we have people passing our porno literature on our streets. [peopla LOVE to badrap Las Vegas but it's the ACLU that does it.]

It's not in an employers best interest to fire someone "just for the hell of it" Firing and subsequent rehiring is extremely expensive.

YOU are your own best Union....if you don't like the job go to another one.
It isn't that I don't like my job. I love my job and have been doing it well for many years. But I have had bosses I could not stand. And I am not leaving a job I like doing that has good benefits and decent pay because of an A88hole boss! That is why I like being UNION. I don't have to take too much crap out of a boss that cannot even write a decent memo with correct grammar and spelling and one that treats people like 5 year old children and is often unfair. Doing things like trying to "steer" overtime work to his pet employees who kiss his ass and leave the rest of us out. I am not there to serve the boss or his inflated ego. I am there to work to the best I can and serve my customers who, after all, are paying my salary. I am of the opinion that all many managers are good for is gumming up things and costing money. I have had many good bosses but I have had a few bad ones too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top