City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 69.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (8.9 miles): | 98 |
| Coral Way K-8 Center School (13.8 miles): | 75 |
| Pinecrest Academy Charter Middle School: | 69 |
| Ben Sheppard Annex School (13.1 miles): | 63 |
| Centennial Middle School (12.7 miles): | 47 |
| Howard A. Doolin Middle School (1.7 miles): | 33 |
| Jorge Mas Canosa Middle School (6.7 miles): | 20 |
| Downtown Miami Charter School (15.1 miles): | 7 |
Pinecrest Academy Charter Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
| Miami: | 44 |
| Pinecrest Academy Charter Middle: | 69 |
1
mirta garcia
Sep 10, 2011 @ 1:13 pm
i want to know how to translate my child to that school,she is now at royal green doing 5 grade and i am interesting to start middle school there.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 6022
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 559-8584
Principal: Maria B Nunez
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 112
Senate District: 38
School Web Address: http://Pinecrestpreparatoryacademy.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 516 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 640 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 165
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 559
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 558
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 589 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 589 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 151
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 590 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 416 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 416 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 374 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 374 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 600 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 358 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 358 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 316
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 538 schools: | 44% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 554 |
| State average from 539 schools: | 523 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 539 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 541 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 542 schools: | 53% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 321 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 321 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 63% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 89% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 72% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 508 |
| State average from 526 schools: | 425 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 525 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 526 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 59% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 505 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 462 |
| State average from 506 schools: | 397 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 22% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 506 schools: | 50% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1736 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1904 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1963 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1705 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1831 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1947 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 3% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 5% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 82% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1855 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 337 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1932 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1970 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1896 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1872 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1897 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1981 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1812 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1857 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1943 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 332 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 139 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 695 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 82 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 122 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 699 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 81 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 97 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 704 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 78 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 98
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%| Here: | 319 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1779 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1786 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 87| Here: | 1699 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 1923 |
| State average from 808 schools: | 1746 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 305 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1927 |
| State average: | 1743 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 69| Here: | 1858 |
| State average: | 1668 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 2009 |
| State average from 819 schools: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 294 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2005 |
| State average: | 1807 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 59| Here: | 1946 |
| State average: | 1738 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1719 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1723 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 74| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1852 |
| State average from 804 schools: | 1777 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1799 |
| State average: | 1774 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 52| Here: | 1747 |
| State average: | 1645 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1952 |
| State average from 815 schools: | 1851 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 99%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1948 |
| State average: | 1845 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 75| Here: | 1873 |
| State average: | 1755 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 78| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 675 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 83| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 711 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 685 |
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 147
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 70| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 675 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 78| PINECREST ACADEMY CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL: | 697 |
| State average from 796 schools: | 685 |
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 70
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 83| Here: | 717 |
| State average from 810 schools: | 698 |
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%| Here: | 346 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 99%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.