Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-13-2019, 01:34 PM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,549,884 times
Reputation: 14251

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet757f View Post
You learn the feeling of what a stall feels like at the very beginning of your flying lessons. A stall is a stall. There is a stall warning already built into the system so you can manually compensate. Why try and let the plane do this automatically?
Have you ever flown a transport category turbojet? If you let the stall progress to the point you do in primary training you are dead if below 10,000'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2019, 01:37 PM
 
13,811 posts, read 27,549,884 times
Reputation: 14251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
If you want to sell your new series of 737s as compatible with the old, requiring only minimal pilot retraining - it is. Looks like that's what happened here.

Boeing built an aircraft with substantially changed aerodynamics, but has type commonality as a huge selling point. So they put a software shim between the pilot and the plane, making the new plane feel like the old one. That works right up until the point where stuff breaks.
That isn't why MCAS exists. The MCAS system was installed due to an FAA requirement for control pressure being above standardized certification guidelines to recover from stalls in certain situations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 05:45 PM
 
47,074 posts, read 26,198,282 times
Reputation: 29560
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelsup View Post
That isn't why MCAS exists. The MCAS system was installed due to an FAA requirement for control pressure being above standardized certification guidelines to recover from stalls in certain situations.
I'd say that depends on which sources you listen to. And "control pressure being above standardized certification guidelines to recover from stalls in certain situations" could mean a lot of things.

https://theaircurrent.com/aviation-s...em-mcas-jt610/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 06:16 PM
 
1,803 posts, read 1,250,558 times
Reputation: 3626
Pretty obvious what has happened here.... MAX8 MCAS software had bugs which required astute pilots to understand and mitigate. Southwest, and otherUS airlines probably realized this after, if not before, the INdonesian crash.

Boeing probably knew, as did many airlines, exactlywhat the probable problem was, and how to negate it. More than likely, they also knew the next software release would fix the problem and were hoping nothing bad happened, but then Ethiopia did. They rolled the dice, came up snake eyes.

I’m willing to bet Boeing will have this fixed in record time..... because they already knew the problem and fix, butwere hopingto sneak the fix in without adverse consequences.

Signed, 20 years in software development/deployment for much higher profile entities than Boeing.

Last edited by Cabound1; 03-13-2019 at 07:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,940 posts, read 9,678,375 times
Reputation: 23257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Des-Lab View Post
Let's be honest here. Most Americans couldn't give two licks about plane crashes that happen in places like Ethiopia or Indonesia. They really don't.
This didn't age well, America just halted all the Boeing 8s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 07:15 PM
DKM
 
Location: California
6,767 posts, read 3,911,172 times
Reputation: 6690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
This didn't age well, America just halted all the Boeing 8s.
It was also a very stupid comment because every American should care when a new Boeing crashes. Its literally our number 1 export to the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2019, 09:23 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,866 posts, read 58,512,026 times
Reputation: 46420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabound1 View Post
Pretty obvious what has happened here.... MAX8 MCAS software had bugs which required astute pilots to understand and mitigate. ....
I’m willing to bet Boeing will have this fixed in record time..... because they already knew the problem and fix, butwere hopingto sneak the fix in without adverse consequences.

Signed, 20 years in software development/deployment for much higher profile entities than Boeing.
Yes, the fix has already been done (software / code wise) + the manual override was provided in Operational Control Bulletin.

But...This will not be quick to "Return-to-service" 3 months - 1 yr I will guess (to re-qualify-FAA)

They still won't have the full understanding of latest crash that soon.

I am not convinced a 28YO 'Senior Captain' backed up by a FA with 200Hrs qualifies for "astute pilots"

I feel better with some 'gray hair' in the cockpit.

YMMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2019, 12:41 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,940 posts, read 9,678,375 times
Reputation: 23257
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKM View Post
It was also a very stupid comment because every American should care when a new Boeing crashes. Its literally our number 1 export to the world.
Agreed. Stating that America didn't care about 2 Boeing crash months apart was just silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2019, 06:20 AM
 
Location: World
4,204 posts, read 4,715,160 times
Reputation: 2841
"If it ain't a Boeing, I'm not going"


Anybody remember the history behind this slogan ?


Probably when DC-10 had some crashes in 1970s or Airbus made entry in United states, Boeing made up this. Now they have a reputation to fulfill otherwise this phrase will get reversed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2019, 06:32 AM
 
14,554 posts, read 20,838,644 times
Reputation: 8018
Why doesn't Boeing consider that the design of the MAX may be part of the problem > engines located closer to the fuselage. It seems they are going with better training of pilots worldwide and new software.

Placement of the wings must affect the aerodynamics in some way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top