Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2022, 04:00 PM
 
Location: plano
7,887 posts, read 11,403,116 times
Reputation: 7798

Advertisements

Houston has a record of growth in more directions than DFW. I dont know much about Atlanta. Clear Lake City was one of the earliest MPC's, the owner of CLC donated land to Rice who donate it for NASA Johnson Space Center. Kingwood and the Woodlands were the next mega MPC's developed. They both exceed 10k acres in size. First Colony, Cinco and Copperfield came along next I believe were smaller than the 2 mega MPCs.

Development slowed to the SW as flood or levee districts were needed and added a taxing entity developments n other directions did not incur. Fairfield was next at around 3k acres as I recall. The thinking back in those days was growth NW and West were less prone to flooding. The southern Development happened later for reasons not clear in my mind.

Big commercial development pushed west which was key to the strong early push to the West and NW with large employers building center like Shell and Compaq/HP as two examples.

Will be interesting to see what WFH and more recent flooding events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2022, 04:43 PM
 
15,407 posts, read 7,468,300 times
Reputation: 19337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnhw2 View Post
Houston has a record of growth in more directions than DFW. I dont know much about Atlanta. Clear Lake City was one of the earliest MPC's, the owner of CLC donated land to Rice who donate it for NASA Johnson Space Center. Kingwood and the Woodlands were the next mega MPC's developed. They both exceed 10k acres in size. First Colony, Cinco and Copperfield came along next I believe were smaller than the 2 mega MPCs.

Development slowed to the SW as flood or levee districts were needed and added a taxing entity developments n other directions did not incur. Fairfield was next at around 3k acres as I recall. The thinking back in those days was growth NW and West were less prone to flooding. The southern Development happened later for reasons not clear in my mind.

Big commercial development pushed west which was key to the strong early push to the West and NW with large employers building center like Shell and Compaq/HP as two examples.

Will be interesting to see what WFH and more recent flooding events
Clear Lake City was a Friendswood Development project at a time when the company was an Exxon subsidiary. Exxon had bought the 30,000+ acre West ranch, donated the land for NASA via Rice, etc. Kingwood was a joint project of Friendswood Development and the King Ranch. Friendswood Development was sold to Lennar after all of the big Exxon land parcels were developed.

The Woodlands was something like 22,000 acres(maybe more) and was driven by George Mitchell and Mitchell Energy. The remainder was sold to Howard Hughes Corporation after George Mitchell died.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2022, 11:22 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,769,052 times
Reputation: 3774
Development is coming to Brookshire: 1,000+ homes.

https://communityimpact.com/houston/...ded-to-waller/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Houston
2,188 posts, read 3,215,538 times
Reputation: 1551
School district will determine who moves in there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,612 posts, read 4,933,753 times
Reputation: 4553
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbcu View Post
School district will determine who moves in there
Yep. I wonder what the maximum price buyers are willing to pay in Royal ISD. Generally, it's had to stay at whatever entry-level is at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,470 posts, read 4,067,453 times
Reputation: 4517
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocalPlanner View Post
Yep. I wonder what the maximum price buyers are willing to pay in Royal ISD. Generally, it's had to stay at whatever entry-level is at the time.
If one big developer goes in there, can't they just set the tone regardless of the existing school district. While it isn't highly rated, it's only 2400 kids, and 670 in their High school. If they go 6A schools within the district, one new development could drown out the reputation of the town. Even typical starter homes are probably above the price point of the majority of Brookshire not zoned to Katy ISD schools.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Foster, TX
1,179 posts, read 1,914,309 times
Reputation: 1525
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigerianNightmare View Post
If one big developer goes in there, can't they just set the tone regardless of the existing school district. While it isn't highly rated, it's only 2400 kids, and 670 in their High school. If they go 6A schools within the district, one new development could drown out the reputation of the town. Even typical starter homes are probably above the price point of the majority of Brookshire not zoned to Katy ISD schools.
Chicken : Egg paradox. What establishes the price point for a given housing market? Quality of schools, for starters. What dictates the quality of schools? Generally, the price points of said housing market.

Convince people the neighborhood is worth paying a premium (relative to existing housing stock), and you may start to turn the tide on the perception of the school district (Assuming families are willing to enroll their kids in the local ISD). As the perception turns, the housing market may pick up, and thus the area starts appreciating in value. As the area appreciates in value and attracts higher income families, the schools continue to improve.

Brenham ISD and a few other country ISDs come to mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,612 posts, read 4,933,753 times
Reputation: 4553
Quote:
Originally Posted by NTexas2010 View Post
Chicken : Egg paradox. What establishes the price point for a given housing market? Quality of schools, for starters. What dictates the quality of schools? Generally, the price points of said housing market.

Convince people the neighborhood is worth paying a premium (relative to existing housing stock), and you may start to turn the tide on the perception of the school district (Assuming families are willing to enroll their kids in the local ISD). As the perception turns, the housing market may pick up, and thus the area starts appreciating in value. As the area appreciates in value and attracts higher income families, the schools continue to improve.

Brenham ISD and a few other country ISDs come to mind.
The perception of Brenham ISD hasn't really improved despite affluent households moving to the area. Too much economic diversity for former suburbanites apparently. Typical of rural ISDs.

However, some have chosen to send their kids to Burton, which accepts transfers and apparently is more palatable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2022, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,612 posts, read 4,933,753 times
Reputation: 4553
Compare the starting perceptions of Royal vs. Waller. Waller was more of an unknown - not necessarily good or bad reputation. That kind of situation is easier to make acceptable in the marketplace.

Royal, on the other hand, has had a pretty seriously negative perception. Not saying any of this is fair of course, just stating what the market perception has been. It's harder to turn that around with new development vs. the Waller situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2022, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Houston
2,188 posts, read 3,215,538 times
Reputation: 1551
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocalPlanner View Post
Compare the starting perceptions of Royal vs. Waller. Waller was more of an unknown - not necessarily good or bad reputation. That kind of situation is easier to make acceptable in the marketplace.

Royal, on the other hand, has had a pretty seriously negative perception. Not saying any of this is fair of course, just stating what the market perception has been. It's harder to turn that around with new development vs. the Waller situation.
Yep - waller was "out there" and you hear little about it But they invested in new schools for the past 20 years so it looks nice lol -

Royal never has been the place to go - the actual city/town is dead, demographics aren't in its favor, etc - only way you'll avoid feeding the stigma is they construct a new school specifically for that development
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top